I also live in N.S Canada and have had enough frost problems with my co2 tanks to cause a major loss of accuracy any time when playing in a fall or spring although it is rare in the summer.
but my main reason for preferring HPA is the ease of use once you are set up also if you gun is 21+ years of age what is it kinda love seeing oldish paintball guns On Friday, 24 January 2014 18:36:00 UTC-4, [email protected] wrote: > > Makes sense if you have the HPA kit already but tanks don't fire at > multiple-balls-per-second rates so I can't imagine freezing being a problem > unless you really screw up your installation. > > To put my paintballing experience in context, I still use an inline > blow-back gun that has no external air lines, uses a 7oz bottle as a stock, > requires a syphon (NOT an anti-syphon) tube and is old enough to vote and > drink . . . > > On Friday, January 24, 2014 8:14:00 PM UTC, morrdubay wrote: >> >> As a paintballer I almost never use co2 anymore co2 freezes up and can >> break paint and accuracy problems of all sorts. With hpa everything just is >> simpler. As for being hard to refill them use a scuba than and get a fill >> adapter a 250 ish set up and then can get the scuba filled for 20 ish >> dollars over a time it is much cheaper than co2. The 3 tanks me and my >> friends are building are all going to be run on hpa and not co2 > > -- -- You are currently subscribed to the "R/C Tank Combat" group. To post a message, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe, send email to [email protected] Visit the group at http://groups.google.com/group/rctankcombat --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "R/C Tank Combat" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
