With Ankur's lazy-/auto-preemption patches applied and with a
lazy-preemptible kernel in combination with a non-preemptible RCU,
lockdep sometimes complains about context switches within RCU read-side
critical sections.  This is a false positive due to rcu_read_unlock()
updating lockdep state too late:

        __release(RCU);
        __rcu_read_unlock();
        // Context switch here results in lockdep false positive!!!
        rcu_lock_release(&rcu_lock_map); /* Keep acq info for rls diags. */

Although this complaint could also happen with preemptible RCU
in a preemptible kernel, the odds of that happening aer quite low.
In constrast, with non-preemptible RCU, a long critical section has a
high probability of performing a context switch from the preempt_enable()
in __rcu_read_unlock().

The fix is straightforward, just move the rcu_lock_release()
within rcu_read_unlock() to obtain the reverse order from that of
rcu_read_lock():

        rcu_lock_release(&rcu_lock_map); /* Keep acq info for rls diags. */
        __release(RCU);
        __rcu_read_unlock();

This commit makes this change.

Co-developed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <[email protected]>
Co-developed-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <[email protected]>
Co-developed-by: Boqun Feng <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Paul E. McKenney <[email protected]>
Cc: Ankur Arora <[email protected]>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
---
 include/linux/rcupdate.h | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/rcupdate.h b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
index 17d7ed5f3ae6..2c54750e36a0 100644
--- a/include/linux/rcupdate.h
+++ b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
@@ -809,9 +809,9 @@ static inline void rcu_read_unlock(void)
 {
        RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN(!rcu_is_watching(),
                         "rcu_read_unlock() used illegally while idle");
+       rcu_lock_release(&rcu_lock_map); /* Keep acq info for rls diags. */
        __release(RCU);
        __rcu_read_unlock();
-       rcu_lock_release(&rcu_lock_map); /* Keep acq info for rls diags. */
 }
 
 /**
-- 
2.39.2


Reply via email to