On Thu, May 30, 2024 at 03:45:52PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> Now that the (de-)offloading process can only apply to offline CPUs,
> there is no more concurrency between rcu_core and nocb kthreads. Also
> the mutation now happens on empty queues.
> 
> Therefore the state machine can be reduced to a single bit called
> SEGCBLIST_OFFLOADED. Simplify the transition as follows:
> 
> * Upon offloading: queue the rdp to be added to the rcuog list and
>   wait for the rcuog kthread to set the SEGCBLIST_OFFLOADED bit. Unpark
>   rcuo kthread.
> 
> * Upon de-offloading: Park rcuo kthread. Queue the rdp to be removed
>   from the rcuog list and wait for the rcuog kthread to clear the
>   SEGCBLIST_OFFLOADED bit.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <[email protected]>
> ---
[...]
> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h
> index 24daf606de0c..72a2990d2087 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h
> +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h
[...]
> @@ -1079,29 +1080,14 @@ static int rcu_nocb_rdp_deoffload(struct rcu_data 
> *rdp)
>                * but we stick to paranoia in this rare path.
>                */
>               rcu_nocb_lock_irqsave(rdp, flags);
> -             rcu_segcblist_clear_flags(&rdp->cblist, SEGCBLIST_KTHREAD_GP);
> -             rcu_nocb_unlock_irqrestore(rdp, flags);
> +             rcu_segcblist_clear_flags(&rdp->cblist, SEGCBLIST_OFFLOADED);
> +             raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rdp->nocb_lock, flags);
>  

Dropping rdp->nocb_lock unconditionally means we are the holder of it,
right? If so, I think we better replace the above
rcu_nocb_lock_irqsave() with raw_spin_lock_irqsave().

Regards,
Boqun

>               list_del(&rdp->nocb_entry_rdp);
>       }
> +
>       mutex_unlock(&rdp_gp->nocb_gp_kthread_mutex);
>  
> -     /*
> -      * Lock one last time to acquire latest callback updates from kthreads
> -      * so we can later handle callbacks locally without locking.
> -      */
> -     rcu_nocb_lock_irqsave(rdp, flags);
> -     /*
> -      * Theoretically we could clear SEGCBLIST_LOCKING after the nocb
> -      * lock is released but how about being paranoid for once?
> -      */
> -     rcu_segcblist_clear_flags(cblist, SEGCBLIST_LOCKING);
> -     /*
> -      * Without SEGCBLIST_LOCKING, we can't use
> -      * rcu_nocb_unlock_irqrestore() anymore.
> -      */
> -     raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rdp->nocb_lock, flags);
> -
>       return 0;
>  }
>  
[...]

Reply via email to