Hi, Thank you for your note. I'll pass your comments on to our content team for review and correction.
We have setup a more robust mechanism to track and report back on these types of issues by adding a help topic to our RDA Toolkit Support Center (www.rdatoolkit.org/support) titled "Content Related". Going forward if you could use this system to report these types of content issues it will help us track them and resolve them efficiently. Thank you for taking the time to help us improve the quality of the RDA Toolkit. Kind regards, Troy Linker Publisher, ALA Digital Reference American Library Association (312) 280-5101 www.rdatoolkit.org www.guidetoreference.org -----Original Message----- From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Fernando Gómez Sent: Friday, May 21, 2010 4:29 PM To: [email protected] Subject: [RDA-L] Errata for RDA Entity Relationship Diagrams The entity-relationship diagrams available at [1] are a great help to understand RDA. While studying them I've found a few errors -- should they be reported through this list? For example, in the document "Person Relationships" [2], page 4, the relationship designators for Related Corporate Body and those for Related Person have been swaped. The diagram on page 3 shows the correct values. Regards, Fernando [1] http://www.rdatoolkit.org/background [2] http://www.rdatoolkit.org/backgroundfiles/RelationshipsPerson_10_09_09.pdf -- Fernando Gómez Biblioteca "Antonio Monteiro" INMABB (Conicet / Universidad Nacional del Sur) Av. Alem 1253 B8000CPB Bahía Blanca, Argentina Tel. +54 (291) 459 5116 http://inmabb.criba.edu.ar/
