Hi Troy, It is an excellent that you have instituted a mechanism to track and report back on RDA content issues!
I see that there is an option to "Check Ticket Status" for our own "support requests complete with responses". Is there any way to make it possible for everyone to be able to search *everyone's* content related support requests, not just the ones we make ourselves. It would be very, very useful to know the kinds of *content-related* questions that others have, and, even more so, the official answers to those questions. Regards, Deborah ------ Deborah Fritz MARC Database Consultant The MARC of Quality www.marcofquality.com Voice/Fax: (321) 676-1904 > -----Original Message----- > From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description > and Access [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of > Troy Linker > Sent: Monday, May 24, 2010 12:07 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Errata for RDA Entity Relationship Diagrams > > Hi, > > Thank you for your note. I'll pass your comments on to our > content team for review and correction. > > We have setup a more robust mechanism to track and report > back on these types of issues by adding a help topic to our > RDA Toolkit Support Center (www.rdatoolkit.org/support) > titled "Content Related". Going forward if you could use > this system to report these types of content issues it will > help us track them and resolve them efficiently. > > Thank you for taking the time to help us improve the quality > of the RDA Toolkit. > > > Kind regards, > > Troy Linker > Publisher, ALA Digital Reference > American Library Association > (312) 280-5101 > > www.rdatoolkit.org www.guidetoreference.org > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description > and Access [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of > Fernando Gómez > Sent: Friday, May 21, 2010 4:29 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [RDA-L] Errata for RDA Entity Relationship Diagrams > > The entity-relationship diagrams available at [1] are a great > help to understand RDA. While studying them I've found a few > errors -- should they be reported through this list? > > For example, in the document "Person Relationships" [2], page > 4, the relationship designators for Related Corporate Body > and those for Related Person have been swaped. The diagram on > page 3 shows the correct values. > > Regards, > > Fernando > > > [1] http://www.rdatoolkit.org/background > [2] > http://www.rdatoolkit.org/backgroundfiles/RelationshipsPerson_ > 10_09_09.pdf > > > > -- > Fernando Gómez > Biblioteca "Antonio Monteiro" > INMABB (Conicet / Universidad Nacional del Sur) Av. Alem 1253 > B8000CPB Bahía Blanca, Argentina Tel. +54 (291) 459 5116 > http://inmabb.criba.edu.ar/ > > > __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of > virus signature database 5136 (20100521) __________ > > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. > > http://www.eset.com > > > __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 5136 (20100521) __________ The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. http://www.eset.com
