Megan Curran said:

>Currently in our catalog (SirsiDynix Horizon) we have e-book records =
>separate from the records of the same title in print, although in the =
>print record we include a 856 that has the URL to the e-book version. =
>Currently our e-book records do not have item records attached. We are =
>considering changing our records so that the bib record for the print book =
>will have item records representing both the print and electronic forms, =
>with no e-book bib record.
 
This would seem a backward step to me, and contrary to both AACR2 and
RDA, which would have you catalogue the electronic resource, not its
original.
 
The need for a GMD in AACR2 electronic resource records, and different
3XX fields in RDA, as well as  differing fixed fields (even if you use
multiple terms in 3XX) would be a compromise.  We do not yet have
expression level records.  Were I you I would use separate records
with 530/776 in each.  Although the provider neutral standard does not
require 530, we find patrons understand 530 better than 776.


   __       __   J. McRee (Mac) Elrod ([email protected])
  {__  |   /     Special Libraries Cataloguing   HTTP://www.slc.bc.ca/
  ___} |__ \__________________________________________________________

Reply via email to