I am no expert on RDA but, have been wanting to do something like that for some 
time.

Yes, it is work but, seems more in tune with the reality of what people want: I 
want this work (?), I will decide later if I want print, fiche, braille, PDF 
via the web... you fill in the blank. I don't care but, to me, they are all 
copies of the same thing. and a user would / could be most interested in the 
content first, format second.

All in all, it means getting off the 'Biblio'graphic orientation that we have 
had for a long time. Which I think is part of what RDA is all about.

Lawrence Wardroper

Service de la bibliothèque | Library Services
Service administratif des tribunaux judiciaires | Courts Administration Service
90, rue Sparks, Ottawa ON  K1A 0H9
[email protected]
Téléphone | Telephone 613-996-8735

-----Original Message-----
From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of J. McRee Elrod
Sent: Friday, November 12, 2010 7:09 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Combining book & e-book bibs and RDA prep

Megan Curran said:

>Currently in our catalog (SirsiDynix Horizon) we have e-book records =
>separate from the records of the same title in print, although in the =
>print record we include a 856 that has the URL to the e-book version. =
>Currently our e-book records do not have item records attached. We are =
>considering changing our records so that the bib record for the print book =
>will have item records representing both the print and electronic forms, =
>with no e-book bib record.
 
This would seem a backward step to me, and contrary to both AACR2 and
RDA, which would have you catalogue the electronic resource, not its
original.
 
The need for a GMD in AACR2 electronic resource records, and different
3XX fields in RDA, as well as  differing fixed fields (even if you use
multiple terms in 3XX) would be a compromise.  We do not yet have
expression level records.  Were I you I would use separate records
with 530/776 in each.  Although the provider neutral standard does not
require 530, we find patrons understand 530 better than 776.


   __       __   J. McRee (Mac) Elrod ([email protected])
  {__  |   /     Special Libraries Cataloguing   HTTP://www.slc.bc.ca/
  ___} |__ \__________________________________________________________

Reply via email to