Hmm.  Could be right.  However, if III, our system here, could read a MARC
record directly, we might not have this problem.
Our 260 displays just as we record it.  So, what will a patron think, when
he/she sees 1999, c1999.
Why include both dates when one will do.

On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 1:29 PM, Young,Naomi Kietzke <na...@uflib.ufl.edu>wrote:

>  Gene, ****
>
> ** **
>
> This proves what, exactly? If we are to align our cataloging rules to the
> display capability of online systems, we will have an even more dizzying
> area of localized standards. I, for one, do not want to see the ExLibris
> Aleph v20 Policy Decisions published, followed by the III Milennium Rule
> Interpretations, et al. ****
>
> ** **
>
> In a Monday grump,****
>
> ** **
>
> Naomi Young ****
>
> University of Florida ****
>
> na...@uflib.ufl.edu****
>
> Who has been trying to standardize consortial policies and knows at least
> one path to madness.   ****
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access
> [mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] *On Behalf Of *Gene Fieg
> *Sent:* Monday, October 22, 2012 4:24 PM
> *To:* RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
>
> *Subject:* Re: [RDA-L] "Date of publication not identified" & DtSt, Dates*
> ***
>
> ** **
>
> I have also seen both dates entered in the description.  Patrons will
> think we are nuts when they see the display.****
>
> On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 12:56 PM, Joan Wang <jw...@illinoisheartland.org>
> wrote:****
>
> AACR2 requires to record publication date and copyright date if they are
> different. But RDA does not have the same rule. So in AACR2 records, we see
> different dates in 008 field, and would not see the same dates appearing.
> But in RDA records we can see the same dates in 008 field.
>
> Joan Wang ****
>
> ** **
>
> On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 2:47 PM, Benjamin A Abrahamse <babra...@mit.edu>
> wrote:****
>
> I would point out that this is not what I'm seeing in OCLC.
>
> Most RDA records now seem to have Date status set to "t" (Publication date
> and copyright date) and both date fields filled out, accordingly.  Whether
> there is a difference between pub. date and copyright date, or not.
>
> --Ben
>
>
> Benjamin Abrahamse
> Cataloging Coordinator
> Acquisitions, Metadata and Enterprise Systems
> MIT Libraries
> 617-253-7137
>
>
> ****
>
> ** **
>



-- 
Gene Fieg
Cataloger/Serials Librarian
Claremont School of Theology
gf...@cst.edu

Claremont School of Theology and Claremont Lincoln University do not
represent or endorse the accuracy or reliability of any of the information
or content contained in this forwarded email.  The forwarded email is that
of the original sender and does not represent the views of Claremont School
of Theology or Claremont Lincoln University.  It has been forwarded as a
courtesy for information only.

Reply via email to