Martin Kelleher wrote: > Well no - AACR2 has spent about 10 years being revised, ending up with > something I know I'm not especially happy with, and I'm under the > general impression has a lukewarm reception at the best of times... so > maybe that's part of the problem!
After its original publication in 1978, AACR2 was continually revised from 1982 through 2005. And by the way people are carrying on about RDA, you would think that AACR2 was the greatest thing ever produced. Kevin M. Randall Principal Serials Cataloger Northwestern University Library k...@northwestern.edu (847) 491-2939 Proudly wearing the sensible shoes since 1978!
