Many thanks for the responses on my reproduction question. The record in question has been edited & makes much more sense.
I realize that LC is now cataloging the work in hand, rather than the original when cataloging reproductions in their RDA records. My understanding had been (taken from a response from LC some months back along with OCLC guidance http://www.oclc.org/bibformats/en/specialcataloging/default.shtm#CHDCIDAF) that the change in approach was ONLY for RDA & that for AACR2 cataloging we should continue to follow the LCRI. I realize the latter comment/observation is not necessarily in the scope of this list. But if someone can direct me to where LC or OCLC (whose rules we ultimately follow for the bulk of our cataloging) says otherwise for AACR2 cataloging, I'd be very interested. Many thanks //SIGNED// Patricia Fogler Chief, Cataloging Section (AUL/LTSC) Muir S. Fairchild Research Information Center DSN 493-2135 Comm (334) 953-2135
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
