That makes the most sense to me. I guess if you want to stick with the language 
of the subject you’d put “updated first edition” or “first edition, updated”.

If you’re going to put in edition twice, it only makes sense to me to put 
“first edition, updated edition” as is updated edition of the first edition. 
“Updated edition, First edition” sounds like the 1st edition of the updated 
edition (of possibly another  edition?) to me.

Martin Kelleher
Metadata Manager
University of Liverpool

From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access 
[mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of Goldfarb, Kathie
Sent: 18 October 2013 16:36
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] edition statements

>From a patron’s point of view, but probably not according to the rules, would 
>be Revised first edition, or First edition, revised.

kathie

Kathleen Goldfarb
Technical Services Librarian
College of the Mainland
Texas City, TX 77539
409 933 8202

P Please consider whether it is necessary to print this email.


From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access 
[mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of Guy Vernon Frost
Sent: Friday, October 18, 2013 9:49 AM
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA<mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA>
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] edition statements

You can string them along separating one from the other by a comma
    250;__; $a Updated edition, First edition.

Sometime after the 2nd qtr OCLC update in 2104 you'll be able to repeat the 250 
field.
    250:__; $a Updated edition.
    250;__; $a First edition.

Guy Frost
Associate Professor of Library Science
Catalog Librarian
Odum Library/Valdosta State University
Valdosta, Georgia 31698-0150
229.259.5060
gfr...@valdosta.edu<mailto:gfr...@valdosta.edu>
FDLP 0125

________________________________
From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access 
<RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA<mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA>> on behalf 
of Baumgarten, Richard, JCL 
<baumgart...@jocolibrary.org<mailto:baumgart...@jocolibrary.org>>
Sent: Friday, October 18, 2013 10:24 AM
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA<mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA>
Subject: [RDA-L] edition statements

I cannot find anywhere in 2.5  about a situation where the title page says 
updated edition and the verso says First edition.  The title was previously 
published.  Do I record both statements or only the statement that I know to be 
true?

Richard Baumgarten
Cataloger
Johnson County Library
P.O. Box 2901
Shawnee Mission, Kansas 66201-1301
(913) 826-4494
baumgart...@jocolibrary.org<mailto:baumgart...@jocolibrary.org>

Reply via email to