Of course Mac and others are right, there's no n.d. in AACR2, and to guess a 
place and a date is better than no information and Not Identified. Still I 
wonder, if I know just 1 place and 1 date, as with much legacy data, whether 
they are of publication, or distribution, or just copyright will make any 
difference in searching.

>>> "J. McRee Elrod" <m...@slc.bc.ca> 12/6/2013 1:00 PM >>>
Jack Wu said:

>you can for the time being at least, go back to AACR:
>Just use: S.L. : s.n., n.d. 

AACR2 did no have "n.d.".  One was supposed to guess, even [19--?].

RDA provides [Place of publication not identified] etc.  Our
cataloguers are instructed to never use those long uninformative
phrases, but rather to make a wild guess, e.g., in our case usually
[Canada?].  The cataloguer with item in hand or PDF on screen is
better placed to guess than the patron at the catalogue.

   __    __   J. McRee (Mac) Elrod (m...@slc.bc.ca)
  {__  |   /     Special Libraries Cataloguing   HTTP://www.slc.bc.ca/
  ___} |__ \__________________________________________________________

Scanned by for virus, malware and spam by SCM appliance

Reply via email to