On Sat, 4 Nov 2006, Andrew Ferguson wrote: > dean gaudet wrote: > > hi... i figure it can't hurt too badly if i commit patches which i've only > > read and not tested. can't be worse than the current situation. > > Thanks Dean! > > I'll try to do some more testing with my patches -- the only possible > issue I anticipate is if someone does a backup on Day 1, applies the > patches on Day 2, does a backup on Day 3, and on Day 4 tries to restore > from Day 1. Maybe rdiff-backup will complain if, for example, it tries > to set a creation date but cannot find one in the Day 1 backup? > > Other than that, they've tested well.
there's actually a test suite in the tree... i've had troubles getting it to work (ben didn't quite document all the requirements it has, such as your userid being 'ben' :) additional tests would be useful (as would documentation for getting it to work). -dean _______________________________________________ rdiff-backup-users mailing list at [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/rdiff-backup-users Wiki URL: http://rdiff-backup.solutionsfirst.com.au/index.php/RdiffBackupWiki
