Andrew Ferguson wrote: > dean gaudet wrote: >> hi... i figure it can't hurt too badly if i commit patches which i've only >> read and not tested. can't be worse than the current situation. > > Thanks Dean! > > I'll try to do some more testing with my patches -- the only possible > issue I anticipate is if someone does a backup on Day 1, applies the > patches on Day 2, does a backup on Day 3, and on Day 4 tries to restore > from Day 1. Maybe rdiff-backup will complain if, for example, it tries > to set a creation date but cannot find one in the Day 1 backup?
I just tested this use case and there weren't any problems. I could make it fail if I updated the server-side to CVS HEAD and kept the client-side at 1.1.5, but that's an unsupported setup anyway, so I'm not going to correct that error. Hope this improves life for the other Mac OS X users, Andrew -- Andrew Ferguson - [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ rdiff-backup-users mailing list at [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/rdiff-backup-users Wiki URL: http://rdiff-backup.solutionsfirst.com.au/index.php/RdiffBackupWiki
