On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 7:09 PM, Brian Kelley <fustiga...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Having used both, I think that boost wrappers are far more pythonic, compile 
> faster, do docstrings better and finally handle exceptions between c++ and 
> Python far better.
> The downside is that when you get a compile error, it is several pages long.

While we are at this, I stumbled few days ago on this project:


That claims to work mostly like boost::python, just without the boost part.

If we were to try removing the boost dependency, I think it could be useful.

Rdkit-devel mailing list

Reply via email to