Can't you get a 32-bit source file and rebuild it for 64?
On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 2:36 PM, George Oakman <[email protected]> wrote: > Thank you all for great comments, what I need to so is starting to be > clearer. > > I just can't find a X86_64 lapack RPM for RHEL4, but I'll keep looking. > If one of you knows where I could find it that'd be great. > > George. > > > From: [email protected] > > To: [email protected] > > Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 15:46:10 -0400 > > CC: [email protected] > > Subject: Re: [Rdkit-discuss] Compiling on Red Hat linux > > > > > > > How about now? > > > http://code.google.com/p/rdkit/wiki/BuildingOnLinux > > > or > > > http://code.google.com/p/rdkit/wiki/NewLinuxBuild > > > > > Ah, this is much better! Would it be possible to add a bullet point with > > options for python-less build? > > > > > > even (?!) the default? > > > > > > That's definitely possible, but I wonder how advisable it is. > > > What fraction of active linux boxes are running 64bit? > > > > I switched all of the linux computers I control to 64 bit for a couple > > of years now. Out of 60+ systems I think I have 32-bit installed on 2, > > one being my old home PC... > > There is simply no good reason to run 32-bit linux on 64-bit hardware. > > All of the old 32-bit programs work fine for me, and there is a bonus > > that I don't have the ancient 2/4 Gb filesize/RAM limits. > > > > Igor > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > > Rdkit-discuss mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rdkit-discuss > > ------------------------------ > Windows Live Messenger just got better. Find out > more!<http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/134665230/direct/01/> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Rdkit-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rdkit-discuss > >
