Hi Greg, I am using bitbucket for my personal projects and it is doing this perfectly fine. However, i keep these private so i have no experience with the public interface.
Cheers, Hans On 01 Feb 2013, at 09:54, Greg Landrum <[email protected]> wrote: > I think it's time to move the primary RDKit codebase from svn to a > distributed version control system.[1] This change is intended to make > it a lot easier for others to work with/contribute to the RDKit. > > It seems like git is winning/has won the argument about which DVCS is > the one to use, so that part seems easy. > > Since I'm pretty unhappy with the new sf.net bug tracker, I would like > to move to a new issue tracker as well. > > The next question is where to host the git repository and the tracker. > There are three obvious options here: github, bitbucket, and google > code. All three offer bug trackers and wikis. > > I'm looking for feedback, suggestions, opinions, rants, etc. on which > of these possibilities I should (or should not) choose. > > -greg > [1] I believe it should be possible to continue to keep the svn > repository in sync with the git code base in the same way that the > current github RDKit version is kept in sync with the sf.net svn repo. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. > Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics > Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: > http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_jan > _______________________________________________ > Rdkit-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rdkit-discuss ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_jan _______________________________________________ Rdkit-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rdkit-discuss
