I do not have the feeling that the handling of a C=P bond should be
different of the one of a C=C bond.
Jean-Marc
Le 11/03/2016 10:12, Greg Landrum a écrit :
On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 10:05 AM, Jean-Marc Nuzillard
<jm.nuzill...@univ-reims.fr <mailto:jm.nuzill...@univ-reims.fr>> wrote:
Le 11/03/2016 05:11, Greg Landrum a écrit :
Here's a question for the chemists in the group: do we need to be
concerned about representing the stereochemistry of the P=C bond
in substructures like O=P(/O)=C/C under normal circumstances?
It has a meaning to write that the configuration of the P=C bond
is Z or E.
If this is the case, I'd love to add some real examples to the test
suite. Can you point me to some examples (or a paper/web page talking
about the topic)?
-greg
--
Jean-Marc Nuzillard
Institut de Chimie Moléculaire de Reims
CNRS UMR 7312
Moulin de la Housse
CPCBAI, Bâtiment 18
BP 1039
51687 REIMS Cedex 2
France
Tel : 03 26 91 82 10
Fax : 03 26 91 31 66
http://www.univ-reims.fr/ICMR
http://www.univ-reims.fr/LSD/
http://www.univ-reims.fr/LSD/JmnSoft/
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Transform Data into Opportunity.
Accelerate data analysis in your applications with
Intel Data Analytics Acceleration Library.
Click to learn more.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=278785111&iu=/4140
_______________________________________________
Rdkit-discuss mailing list
Rdkit-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rdkit-discuss
