Perhaps announce at the RDKit meeting and make the full change for the
first release of next year?  We could also make it a CMAKE option to
use/build the old names, but this would be a bit of work.

Cheers,
 Brian

On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 7:52 AM, Greg Landrum <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Hi Paul,
>
> Nice suggestion. It seems logical to me, though I would probably go with
> RDKit instead of RD as the prefix.
> It's not a small change for people who are using the C++ libs without
> cmake (I wouldn't change the names of the cmake projects, so if you're
> using the RDKit cmake stuff nothing changes), but I suspect there aren't
> that many of you guys.
>
> @Gianluca: what do you think?
>
> Anyone else have an opinion?
>
> -greg
>
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 1:15 PM, Paul Emsley <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>>
>> Greg,
>>
>> RDKit is becoming increasingly popular and is getting picked up by third
>> parties, including
>> the Linux distros.  It seems to me that several RDKit library names are
>> too generic (and
>> hence confusing) for such an environment: I have in mind libs such as
>> Alignment, Catalog,
>> FileParsers (and others).  I suggest that all RDKit libraries are
>> prefixed with RD (like
>> RDGeneral and RDInchi). I think that this should be done by at
>> RDKit-Central rather than by
>> patches applied by package maintainers at the distros.
>>
>> Yes, this will involve some fiddling for us C++ RDKit users, but worth
>> it, I think.
>>
>> Paul.
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>> ------------------
>> _______________________________________________
>> Rdkit-discuss mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rdkit-discuss
>>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> ------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Rdkit-discuss mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rdkit-discuss
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Rdkit-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rdkit-discuss

Reply via email to