On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 1:52 PM, Greg Landrum <greg.land...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Nice suggestion. It seems logical to me, though I would probably go with > RDKit instead of RD as the prefix. > It's not a small change for people who are using the C++ libs without cmake > (I wouldn't change the names of the cmake projects, so if you're using the > RDKit cmake stuff nothing changes), but I suspect there aren't that many of > you guys. > > @Gianluca: what do you think? >From the Fedora point of view, clashes happens, and we deal with them as they are discovered; I could check if some of the common library names are already in the repositories, but adding some prefix should fix the issue permanently. Of course, changing names is a bit of a hassle for those usign the previous names, as they needs to rebuild dependent packages; however, given there are none as of today, I don't think it will be a big issue. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Rdkit-discuss mailing list Rdkit-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rdkit-discuss
