Here’s a modest step in the right direction 
https://www.wildcardconsulting.dk/useful-information/how-to-solve-problems-with-coordinate-bonds-in-rdkit/

Best regards, Jan
On 13 Sep 2018, at 15:14, Greg Landrum 
<greg.land...@gmail.com<mailto:greg.land...@gmail.com>> wrote:

Hi Michal,

Though the RDKit theoretically has many of the infrastructure pieces required 
to handle organometallics (though there's not a lot you can do with them once 
you've loaded them), the difficult part almost always ends up being finding 
input files that have reasonably machine-readable structures in them.

If you have some examples you can share, I'd be happy to take a look to see if 
I can suggest ways to read them in.

Best,
-greg


On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 10:30 PM Michal Krompiec 
<michal.kromp...@gmail.com<mailto:michal.kromp...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hello,
I've been asked to analyze a dataset of organometallic compounds (provided in 
SDF), but it turns out that most of them are not compatible with RDKit (due to 
having pi-alkene, pi-allyl, cyclopentadienyl et al. ligands). The structures 
can be correctly represented in Marvin, though. Can anybody point me to a 
toolkit (or RDKit hack) that can handle these?
Best,
Michal

====
Dr. Michal Krompiec
Adjunct Professor
School of Chemistry, University of Southampton
Highfield, Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK

and
Head of Computational Modelling | Performance Materials | Early Research and 
Business Development
Merck
_______________________________________________
Rdkit-discuss mailing list
Rdkit-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net<mailto:Rdkit-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net>
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rdkit-discuss
_______________________________________________
Rdkit-discuss mailing list
Rdkit-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net<mailto:Rdkit-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net>
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rdkit-discuss

_______________________________________________
Rdkit-discuss mailing list
Rdkit-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rdkit-discuss

Reply via email to