Ian,

    I think the idea is that the (out-of-plane) p orbital on the carbonyl C is both part of the ring pi-system and the carbonyl pi-system. However, both pi-electrons in the carbonyl 'belong to' the oxygen because it's more electronegative, and they thus aren't counted in the 4N+2.

    I am sure that explanation would pain a theoretical chemist, but, as Greg has pointed out, this is as much an informatics issue as a chemistry issue.

    The RDKit aromaticity perception is quite an inclusive one: others (/e.g./ Biovia's) are less so and wouldn't count pyridone as aromatic.

        Francis

On 23/10/2018 12:48, Ian Tickle wrote:

Francis

Sorry yes you're right, the C with the exocyclic d.b. doesn't contribute its p electron to the pi system, but then doesn't that break the aromaticity since a continuous ring of contributing p orbitals is surely a requirementI would say that 2-pyridone should not be classed as aromatic for the same reason but its tautomer 2-hydroxypyridine Oc1ccccn1 clearly is. In 2-pyridone the ring C-C bond lengths alternate between conjugated single (1.45) and double (1.34) whereas in 2-hydoxypyridine they are all around the aromatic C-C length (1.39).

I guess it all depends on how you define 'aromatic' but as I understand it there are 4 necessary conditions:

1. Must be cyclic.
2. Every atom in the ring must be conjugated (i.e. contributes a p orbital to the pi system).
3. Must have 4n+2 pi electrons.
4. Ring must be planar (i.e. any stereochemical distortion breaks the aromaticity even if the other 3 conditions are fulfilled).

You could add that bond lengths between like atom types should be about equal, but that follows from the other conditions.

Cheers

-- Ian


On Tue, 23 Oct 2018 at 11:45, Francis Atkinson <fran...@ebi.ac.uk <mailto:fran...@ebi.ac.uk>> wrote:

    Ian,

        I make it 6 electrons: two from the N, none from the C double
    bonded to the exocyclic N, and one each from four other carbons in
    the ring. It's isoelectronic with /e.g./ pyridone, which is
    aromatic in RDKit...

    In [1]: from rdkit import Chem

    In [2]: Chem.MolToSmiles(Chem.MolFromSmiles('O=c1[nH]cccc1'))
    Out[2]: 'O=c1cccc[nH]1'

        The protonated/tautomerised version are indeed aromatic
    (interconverting bewteen these species was actually how I came
    across this issue), but I still reckon the unprotonated bicyclic
    should be aromatic too...

            Francis

    On 23/10/2018 11:18, Ian Tickle wrote:

    Hi, it seems to me that neither is aromatic since the
    N-substituted hetero ring breaks the Huckel rule by having 7 e-
    (2 from the N and 1 each from the 5 Cs).  If you remove 1 e- from
    the N (so it's [n+]) and also make the external double bond into
    a single (picking up a proton on the other N) it becomes
    pyridinium which is certainly aromatic.

    [n+]12ccccc1NCCC2

    [n+]12ccccc1NC.CC2

    What does it make of those?

    Cheers

    -- Ian


    On Tue, 23 Oct 2018 at 10:37, Francis Atkinson <fran...@ebi.ac.uk
    <mailto:fran...@ebi.ac.uk>> wrote:

        Hello,

             In the following pair of molecules, the bicyclic is
        non-aromatic,
        whereas the 'ring-opened' analogue is aromatic...

        In [1]: from rdkit import Chem

        In [2]: Chem.MolToSmiles(Chem.MolFromSmiles('n12ccccc1=NCCC2'))
        Out[2]: 'C1=CC2=NCCCN2C=C1'

        In [3]: Chem.MolToSmiles(Chem.MolFromSmiles('n12ccccc1=NC.CC2'))
        Out[3]: 'CCn1ccccc1=NC'

        Notebook version:
        
https://nbviewer.jupyter.org/gist/flatkinson/b88eb42510a79594a9e37042eeb7e224

        This seems counter-intuitive to me: I don't see why the
        pyridine in the
        first molecule shouldn't be aromatic, just as it is in the
        second.

        Am I missing something here?

             Thanks,

                 Francis

-- Dr Francis L Atkinson

        Chemogenomics Group
        European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI)
        European Molecular Biology Laboratory
        Wellcome Genome Campus
        Hinxton
        Cambridge CB10 1SD
        United Kingdom

        (01223) 494473



        _______________________________________________
        Rdkit-discuss mailing list
        Rdkit-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net
        <mailto:Rdkit-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net>
        https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rdkit-discuss

-- Dr Francis L Atkinson

    Chemogenomics Group
    European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI)
    European Molecular Biology Laboratory
    Wellcome Genome Campus
    Hinxton
    Cambridge CB10 1SD
    United Kingdom

    (01223) 494473

--
Dr Francis L Atkinson

Chemogenomics Group
European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI)
European Molecular Biology Laboratory
Wellcome Genome Campus
Hinxton
Cambridge CB10 1SD
United Kingdom

(01223) 494473

_______________________________________________
Rdkit-discuss mailing list
Rdkit-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rdkit-discuss

Reply via email to