Wrenches:
This is a really great thread. Here’s my two cents…
I started selling and configuring battery systems when I got out of the Army
back in 1967 I’m a marine electrician. In the boat environment everybody tries
to make a big battery out of a bunch of small batteries, Over the years this is
what I’ve witnessed; All else being equal.
3 parallel strings = 4 ½ to 5 ½ years Max
2 parallel strings = 5 ½ to 6 ½ years Max
1 series string = 8 to 12 years Max
The above seems to hold true if the charge settings, Bulk, Absorb time and
Voltage are correctly set. But as we all know 85% of the time this is not the
case.
So my conclusion is that parallel configured banks just about cut the life in
half.
And there is always the stories about the guy that drank a quart of Bourbon a
day and smoked cigars chasing women until he was 102 years old. The same is
true with batteries… the exception but not the rule.
Tom Duffy
Systems Design Engineer
[email protected]
575-539-2111 X 122
Although no trees were killed in the sending of this message, a large number of
electrons were terribly inconvenienced.
Confidentiality Notice: This message including any attachments is for the sole
use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged
information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is
prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender
and delete any copies of this message.
_____
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Allan Sindelar
Sent: Wednesday, June 01, 2011 11:07 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [RE-wrenches] 24 volt Battery Bank comparison
I had done this a few times in the distant past, and also had done it in recent
years on my own previous battery bank (four strings of S-530s - yes, I know; it
was in anticipation of future plans to upgrade to 48V, and two strings wouldn't
have been enough).
It worked fine - and that turned out to be a problem. I had noticed reduced
capacity, but assumed foolishly that it was simply to age and cycle life (going
on six years and three teenagers). Found out I had two failed cells in two
different strings. The parallel connections probably - I'm not sure here -
allowed the bank to perform more robustly and less obviously weakened. It might
have even allowed the bank to perform as if both failed cells had been in the
same string. But it also allowed me to not pay enough attention to a
potentially serious problem by disguising it.
I blame myself more than the parallel connectors (just some #2 interconnects I
had lying around). I'm just not sure I would use it on a customer's system.
Allan Sindelar
<mailto:[email protected]> [email protected]
NABCEP Certified Photovoltaic Installer
NABCEP Certified Technical Sales Professional
New Mexico EE98J Journeyman Electrician
Positive Energy, Inc.
3201 Calle Marie
Santa Fe, New Mexico 87507
505 424-1112
www.positiveenergysolar.com <http://www.positiveenergysolar.com/>
On 6/1/2011 9:20 AM, [email protected] wrote:
Does it make any difference to do as boB recently suggested and inter-connect
the strings? So in other words, if you have two parallel strings, what happens
if you parallel each battery in one string with the battery in the other
string? Has anyone tried this? It might help insure more balance between each
series string.
Todd
On Wednesday, June 1, 2011 3:06am, "James Surrette"
<mailto:[email protected]> <[email protected]> said:
Hi boB,
I would say maintenance is a large issue - especially when dealing with L-16's
or the like, as the number of cells & connections gets large, i.e. 1000-1200AH
@ 48VDC is three (3) strings, 24 batteries and 72 cells. Will a client water
24 cells...maybe - 72??
However, from Tech Support days, imbalance is the larger problem. It seems to
take 18 months - 3 years and then you would get SG readings where one (1) bank
was perfect and the other(s) is significantly lower......which is hard to
overcome without effort (either break the banks & charge independently or
hammer the banks and allow the high string to get even higher).
One of the key take aways that often gets overlooked is the proper initial
activation of the strings. It is impossible for all cells to have identical
resting voltage. During commissioning, each string should be charged to
2.45-2.5VPC and held until all cells read the same voltage. If running
multiple strings, then connect the strings and run the entire bank at
2.45-2.5VPC until all cells measure the same voltage. Now the bank is well
balanced and the chances of a major imbalance are greatly reduced. However,
even after this effort, if you use an amp clamp, you will notice slight
differences in the amount of current being accepted by each bank.
Best,
Jamie
>>> boB Gudgel <mailto:[email protected]> <[email protected]> 6/1/2011
>>> 5:00 AM >>>
On 5/31/2011 11:25 PM, Tom Elliot wrote:
Bob,
I totally understand the concern about multiple strings *if the strings are
connected across the battery bank* as had always been the tradition in off-grid
installations. My own experience with such a bank in my system showed why
when I had a single cell get to near meltdown. I was lucky to find it.
This might be a good reason for an installer to have one of those FLIR (or
similar) thermal imager cameras. They're a bit on the expensive side, but
could
really be helpful for so many things. Even just to know if you have left a
nut loose (under load of course)
boB
Maintenance is another reason, such banks are far more difficult to maintain.
But I think those concerns are ameliorated a great deal with a buss bar
installation and once I did that I never had another problem and found the
battery bank much easier to maintain because the strings no longer had to be
right next to each other. Heck, it would be possible to put each series string
in its own box for that matter. And with the inclusion of string fuses that
reduces problems even further.
When living with an off-grid system my biggest concern was system reliability
and redundancy and the idea of a single string failure was a big worry which is
why I never would consider it.
Tom
From: boB Gudgel <mailto:[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2011 8:16 PM
To: RE-wrenches <mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [RE-wrenches] 24 volt Battery Bank comparison
OK, I've been hearing for years now that one battery string is best and maybe
two but no more should be used.
What is the reason for this fear ??? What is the experience with multiple
strings in parallel ??
If it is because of current sharing of the strings, that shouldn't be an
insurmountable problem if the wiring is done right.
If it has to do with the possibility of fire, which Darryl mentioned, seems
that series string fuses could mitigate the possibility of that issue, if
because of shorted cells, just like PV combiners.
Or maybe it has to do with the trouble of getting into the middle of a pile of
batteries ? Use battery boxes ?
The strings are in parallel and so they all get the same voltage, theoretically
anyway if the connections are good.
I would think that the more strings, the LESS stress on individual batteries,
not more. The current in each battery should be less than it would be I would
think.
So what is the real experience ??
Is a battery balancer the answer ??
Thanks,
boB
On May 31, 2011, at 8:23 PM, "Wayne Irwin" <[email protected]> wrote:
I think the verdict is 12 - Rolls 2-YS-31 2430 AH @ 20 HR (one string) and one
dry spare in storage is the best case scenario!
Wayne Irwin, EE
Director of Engineering
Pure Energy Solar International Inc.
State Licensed Solar Contractor
License # CVC56695
[email protected]
http://pureenergysolar.com
352 377-6527 Office
352 336-3299 Fax
352 316-1637 Cell
_____
_______________________________________________
List sponsored by Home Power magazine
List Address: [email protected]
Options & settings:
http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org
List-Archive: http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org
List rules & etiquette:
www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm
Check out participant bios:
www.members.re-wrenches.org
_____
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 10.0.1375 / Virus Database: 1511/3672 - Release Date: 05/31/11
_______________________________________________
List sponsored by Home Power magazine
List Address: [email protected]
Options & settings:
http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org
List-Archive: http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org
List rules & etiquette:
www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm
Check out participant bios:
www.members.re-wrenches.org
This email and its attachments have been scanned by iConnection E-Mail Firewall
for viruses, spam, and malicious content. The information transmitted in this
email is intended only for the entity or person to which it is addressed and
may contain confidential/privileged material. If you received this in error,
please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer. Any
review, retransmission, dissemination, or other use of this information by
persons or entities other than the intended recipient is strictly prohibited.
%^^%
_______________________________________________
List sponsored by Home Power magazine
List Address: [email protected]
Options & settings:
http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org
List-Archive: http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org
List rules & etiquette:
www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm
Check out participant bios:
www.members.re-wrenches.org
_______________________________________________
List sponsored by Home Power magazine
List Address: [email protected]
Options & settings:
http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org
List-Archive: http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org
List rules & etiquette:
www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm
Check out participant bios:
www.members.re-wrenches.org
