Twice I have encountered systems purchased by customers with 40 golf carts in a 24V system. In both cases the inverter was a DR2424. Different suppliers, too, around ten years ago.
Allan

Allan Sindelar
al...@positiveenergysolar.com
NABCEP Certified Photovoltaic Installer
NABCEP Certified Technical Sales Professional
New Mexico EE98J Journeyman Electrician
Positive Energy, Inc.
3201 Calle Marie
Santa Fe, New Mexico 87507
505 424-1112
www.positiveenergysolar.com




On 9/16/2011 12:15 PM, Larry Crutcher, Starlight Solar Power Systems wrote:
Ray,

If we were comparing the T-105 to the Trojan L-16 in a single string, I agree the T-105 will provide more life cycles. Been there, done that. But that was not the comparison. Having 6-8 parallel strings of golf cart batteries is a terrible idea no matter how much better the GC2 may be.

Larry 


On Sep 16, 2011, at 10:01 AM, Ray Walters wrote:

The real point is that the Xantrex guy is correct from a scientific stance. Experimental battery cycle life data shows that some golf cart batteries (T105) do have more rated cycles to 80%DOD than the Trojan L16. (750 vs about 600) A really crappy golf cart battery (some have cycle life below 400 cycles) isn't as good as an L16, yes. You have to base your decision, and your mouth, on test data for the batteries considered. Also, you must always compare at 80% DOD, for an apples to apples comparison. Its usually a clue if a manu doesn't publish their cycle life data. Of course you must temper the golf cart vs L16 decision with good paralleling technique.
We use golf cart batteries (never more than 4 strings), jump straight to the HUPs for larger banks, and skip the L16s all together. They just don't make sense when you look at the cost/ amp hr vs their lifespan.
The only time I could see using L16s, was if the battery bank requirements were beyond 4 strings of golf cart batteries, and the customer just could not afford the HUPs, or were going to sell the property soon, and wouldn't appreciate their long term value.
I've spent a lot of time looking at cycle life data, comparing costs, adding in maintenance and replacement labor, etc..
L16s are serious losers on a $/ kwh operating cost comparison, so this is a chance to up sell the customer to HUPs (or equivalent) and make both of you happier in the long run.

Ray Walters




 On 9/16/2011 10:15 AM, Larry Crutcher, Starlight Solar wrote:
Hi Ron,
Have a look back a few months ago to the discussion about multiple battery strings. My synopsis: large, parallel banks are not good; fewer strings are always better. How large a bank are we talking about here?
 
Scientist?? That sounds kind of like “Yea, I been a ‘lectrician for XX years...”, something I have heard hundreds of times. It’s just pride saying “Look, I can pee that far too!” when in reality they are clueless about DC power systems. I’m ranting but my point is you should convince your customer that a hands-on, real world experienced professional has a much broader understanding of RE system intricacies than a “scientist”.
 
Larry
 
From: Ron Young
Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2011 5:11 PM
Subject: Re: [RE-wrenches] battery cycle life, US Battery
 
Hi Larry,
Client has asked me to compare the cycle life because he is upgrading a large battery bank and has been convinced by a Xantrex "scientist" that golf cart batteries are superior to L-16's even though it involves twice as many batteries, connections, cells, footprint etc. So to convince his purchasing committee he wants to know the difference in cycle life between a U.S.B 208 and a Surrette S-460.
 
Ron
 


_______________________________________________
List sponsored by Home Power magazine

List Address: RE-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org

Options & settings:
http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

List-Archive: http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

List rules & etiquette:
www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm

Check out participant bios:
www.members.re-wrenches.org

_______________________________________________
List sponsored by Home Power magazine

List Address: RE-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org

Options & settings:
http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

List-Archive: http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

List rules & etiquette:
www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm

Check out participant bios:
www.members.re-wrenches.org


_______________________________________________ List sponsored by Home Power magazine List Address: RE-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org Options & settings: http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org List-Archive: http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org List rules & etiquette: www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm Check out participant bios: www.members.re-wrenches.org
_______________________________________________
List sponsored by Home Power magazine

List Address: RE-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org

Options & settings:
http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

List-Archive: http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

List rules & etiquette:
www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm

Check out participant bios:
www.members.re-wrenches.org

Reply via email to