Hey Todd,
Yep. We use the Sun Xtender and Lifeline 2 volt L16 AGM's for 12 volt systems 
in RV's and small off grid. We also sell the Tall GC2 battery for lower 
capacity applications. So far, so good.

I have not sold any flooded 2v L16's but we have sold Crown 6 volt L16's for 
years and I have not had a single failure yet.

Larry Crutcher
Starlight Solar Power Systems



On Sep 17, 2011, at 10:36 AM, [email protected] wrote:

> What about the 2 volt L-16 versions? Has anyone had success with them for 
> larger banks? I work alone and HUPs are too heavy to lift on my own... 
> however 24, L-16's in one series string would be a hell of a battery bank too.
>  
> Todd
>  
>  
>  
>  
> On Friday, September 16, 2011 1:03pm, "Ray Walters" <[email protected]> said:
> 
> Larry, 
> 
> I totally agree, that's a ridiculous # of batteries and strings. If that's 
> really the case, it seems L16s will still need 4 to 5 strings, which is also 
> crazy. I see only one solution to this battery bank, and that is the HUP or 
> other large 2 v cell battery. Comparing golf cart batteries to L16s isn't 
> even on the plate for good design in this case. For me, HUPs become a no 
> brainer, as soon as the required amp hours gets into the 1000 AH or higher 
> range. BTW, don't ever use the 100 hr rate for the Rolls, as they are way too 
> optimistic. The 20 hr rates are much closer to reality. The Rolls S-530 
> becomes a 400 AH battery at the 20 hr rate, also they list cycles @50% DOD, 
> when everyone else is looking at 80%DOD, be aware.
> Here's some quicky math, with costs pulled off the internet:
> 3 strings of S530s (@24v) would get you 1200 AH for $4200. cycle life at 80% 
> DOD about 450 to 500 cycles.
> HUPs group 25 have 1270 AH and cost $7392, but last 2100 cycles to 80%DOD. 
> That's about 11.5 cents/ kwh for the life of the battery compared to about 
> 29.2 cents/ kwh for the Rolls S-530s. 
> This quicky calculation doesn't even include the extra maintenance required 
> for watering the L16 type battery, nor the fact that you will have 4 battery 
> replacements for the same time the HUPs just have one replacement. 
> Its very fair to say that the HUPs are more cost effective by about a 3 to1 
> ratio.
> 
> Ray
> 
> 
> 
> Having 6-8 parallel strings of golf cart batteries is a terrible idea no 
> matter how much better the GC2 may be.
> Larry  
> On Sep 16, 2011, at 10:01 AM, Ray Walters wrote:
> 
> The real point is that the Xantrex guy is correct from a scientific stance. 
> Experimental battery cycle life data shows that some golf cart batteries 
> (T105) do have more rated cycles to 80%DOD than the Trojan L16. (750 vs about 
> 600) A really crappy golf cart battery (some have cycle life below 400 
> cycles) isn't as good as an L16, yes. You have to base your decision, and 
> your mouth, on test data for the batteries considered. Also, you must always 
> compare at 80% DOD, for an apples to apples comparison. Its usually a clue if 
> a manu doesn't publish their cycle life data. Of course you must temper the 
> golf cart vs L16 decision with good paralleling technique.
> We use golf cart batteries (never more than 4 strings), jump straight to the 
> HUPs for larger banks, and skip the L16s all together. They just don't make 
> sense when you look at the cost/ amp hr vs their lifespan.
> The only time I could see using L16s, was if the battery bank requirements 
> were beyond 4 strings of golf cart batteries, and the customer just could not 
> afford the HUPs, or were going to sell the property soon, and wouldn't 
> appreciate their long term value.
> I've spent a lot of time looking at cycle life data, comparing costs, adding 
> in maintenance and replacement labor, etc..
> L16s are serious losers on a $/ kwh operating cost comparison, so this is a 
> chance to up sell the customer to HUPs (or equivalent) and make both of you 
> happier in the long run.
> 
> Ray Walters
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Sent from Finest Planet WebMail.
> _______________________________________________
> List sponsored by Home Power magazine
> 
> List Address: [email protected]
> 
> Options & settings:
> http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org
> 
> List-Archive: 
> http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org
> 
> List rules & etiquette:
> www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm
> 
> Check out participant bios:
> www.members.re-wrenches.org
> 

_______________________________________________
List sponsored by Home Power magazine

List Address: [email protected]

Options & settings:
http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

List-Archive: http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

List rules & etiquette:
www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm

Check out participant bios:
www.members.re-wrenches.org

Reply via email to