Good point. As I'm sure you've experienced, new means NO usually until the case is made.
This all came to a head as we ran into a fairly inaccessible attic location where feeding conduit is out of the question. I'll go for it and hope for the best! *Jason Szumlanski* *Fafco Solar* On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 10:51 AM, William Miller <[email protected]>wrote: > Jason: > > If bare copper can be subject to damage in the attic, the same would be > true of NMC. Is your inspector willing to shut down every residential > wiring project in his/her jurisdiction? I don't think so... > > William > > > At 07:41 AM 10/25/2012, you wrote: > > William, > > > Regarding the bare CU in the attic, some local inspectors have a real > issue with what is "subject to physical damage." I'd like some code > citations to be ready if anyone has it handy. > > *Jason Szumlanski* > > > _______________________________________________ > List sponsored by Home Power magazine > > List Address: [email protected] > > Options & settings: > http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org > > List-Archive: > http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org > > List rules & etiquette: > www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm > > Check out participant bios: > www.members.re-wrenches.org > > >
_______________________________________________ List sponsored by Home Power magazine List Address: [email protected] Options & settings: http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org List-Archive: http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org List rules & etiquette: www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm Check out participant bios: www.members.re-wrenches.org
