For an inverter with two MPPT inputs, you will need to treat the negatives and positive lines separate unless the manufacturer says something else.  That means one  SPD per array unfortunately.  Negative and positive connect to separate leads of the SPD and then ground in the middle.  As both positive and negative PV lines rise together relative to ground, the SPD is supposed to clamp that rise to below the equipment's hi-pot voltage that they test to at the factory.  (i.e. common mode voltage rise) All wires except for ground (chassis) of the equipment are tied together and the hi-pot machine (sort of like a Megger ?) applies the high voltage between all those wires on one side and ground on the other to make sure the insulation doesn't break down inside the equipment. This hi-pot test goes for AC  utility input/output connections and DC from the PV input side.

The SPD  has to clamp plus and minus and AC inputs to a lower voltage than this hipot rating but higher voltage than lines will see differentially in voltage.  Remember that in a 3-wire SPD, there is two sets of MOVs in series and the center is tied to ground.  If one MOV starts conducting at say, 500 volts DC then you can apply up to 1000 volts  between the hot leads.  Each plus and negative line can rise up to 500 volts from the lightning before they start to clamp.  The  bigger the lightning strikes effect, the more current will be applied to the MOVs though and the clamp voltage will rise somewhat.  That's why the SPD arrestor voltage should be well below the hi-pot voltage, whatever that is...  Hi-pot voltages are quite a bit higher than the operating voltage.  For example, All Classic CC's are tested to 2270 volts DC from hot lines to ground.  It's something like double the operating voltage plus 1000V and multiply by 1.414 for DC rating.....  I'm going off memory so don't quote me on that but something like that.

I think that Ray has the right idea about short connections like from the local generator.  Battery also.
Just apply SPDs to anything that goes outside like an antenna.

boB


On 10/9/2018 8:26 AM, cwarfel wrote:

I think something on the order of 90+% lightning strikes come from the utility feed, not the dc side. That has to be ignored if in a high strike area orgrid isolated.


On 10/8/2018 10:37 PM, Ray wrote:

I believe you can use the SPD 300 AC on 2 strings, if PV neg is grounded.  You would connect the green to ground (or PV neg) and then connect the red to one string pos, and connect the black to the other string pos.  This would be limited to 300 v also.  I haven't tried that exact configuration, but I have used the 300 AC to protect both the AC in and AC out on 120 vac inverters.  I also believe you can use a 600 DC version, and wire as I mentioned, but the LEDs won't light. If you are using ungrounded inverters, then I think you would need an SPD for each string in order to protect both the pos and neg of each string, like you've been doing.

Maybe someone from Midnite can clarify this.

As far as it being worth it, I haven't had lightning related damage since I started using the Midnite SPDs, and I used to have system damage every year.  If you are not in lightning country, or the install is in a low spot with less likelihood of taking a hit, you might be able to skimp.  But for some of these off grid ridge top installs, I consider it a must. Some times I don't install one on the gen circuit, if its really close.


Ray Walters
Remote Solar
303 505-8760
On 10/8/18 4:03 PM, Drake wrote:
Hello Wrenches,

Do you use surge arrestors with multi MPPT input string inverters? Do you put a separate arrestor on each MPPT input? I find it sort of pricey using a Midnite Solar arrestor on each string, but have been doing that. Is there a less expensive approach that is effective?

I believe the Midnite units are the best. Are they worth the expense?

Thank you,

Drake


Drake Chamberlin
/Athens Electric LLC
OH License 44810
CO License 3773
NABCEP Certified Solar PV
740-448-7328
/http://athens-electric.com/



_______________________________________________
List sponsored by Redwood Alliance

List Address:[email protected]

Change listserver email address & settings:
http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

List-Archive:http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/maillist.html

List rules & etiquette:
www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm

Check out or update participant bios:
www.members.re-wrenches.org




_______________________________________________
List sponsored by Redwood Alliance

List Address:[email protected]

Change listserver email address & settings:
http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

List-Archive:http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/maillist.html

List rules & etiquette:
www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm

Check out or update participant bios:
www.members.re-wrenches.org


--

         Christopher Warfel, PE
       ENTECH Engineering, Inc.
PO Box 871, Block Island, RI 02807
               (401)466-8978

EEI logo <http://entech-engineering.com>


_______________________________________________
List sponsored by Redwood Alliance

List Address: [email protected]

Change listserver email address & settings:
http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

List-Archive: 
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/maillist.html

List rules & etiquette:
www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm

Check out or update participant bios:
www.members.re-wrenches.org


_______________________________________________
List sponsored by Redwood Alliance

List Address: [email protected]

Change listserver email address & settings:
http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

List-Archive: 
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/maillist.html

List rules & etiquette:
www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm

Check out or update participant bios:
www.members.re-wrenches.org

Reply via email to