Unfortunately Ray I have had 2 cases where the Local building inspector
thought that it was a wildfire risk to not have RS, and yes on a ground
mount. Too long to go into here but in the rurals where my clients are, it
can be easier to comply. 

After about 4 phone calls it was easier to just
do what he wanted and then make the change after inspection. Hope others do
not have this issue. 

DAVE ANGELINI OFFGRID SOLAR

"we go where powerlines
don't"
http://members.sti.net/offgridsolar/ [1]
e-mail [email protected]
[2]
text 209 813 0060

On Thu, 13 Feb 2020 15:07:52 -0700, Ray  wrote:   


Here's a page I put in my plan sets to make its clear for the AHJ. I have
not had this challenged, and we have never implemented Rapid Shutdown on a
ground mounted array.  

This points out the problem of inconsistent
interpretation due in part to conflicting or unclear language. I always
like to ask how many basements have protection around the NM conductors
running through and along the rafters. I know several people on CMPs are on
this listserv. I am hoping that they can add some clear language, and not
leave it to a footnote for implementing this aspect of the NEC. On
2/13/2020 4:42 PM, Ray wrote:  

It all comes down to where you install the
PV disconnect. We put it on the wall before the conductors enter the
building or at the array, therefore 690 doesn't apply. Proper signage is
required indicating multiple power sources and listing the locations of
their disconnects.  

Also, this isn't just my opinion, many others on the
list have said this, including folks involved in the code writing process,
and the code says this. The fact that your inspector didn't catch the note
on the figure is to be expected, as it is not out in flashing neon lights.
It is however a clear statement of where 690 stops: at the PV disconnect. 


Unfortunately, this is not further clarified in 2020 from what I can
tell, so we will all continue to suffer inspectors incorrectly expecting
690.12 on ground mounted systems. I would politely ask your inspector to
review that ruling with his higher ups. We can't start setting precedents
that are unreasonable and incorrect. The array wiring is already required
to be protected by either height, protective panels or fencing.  
Ray
Walters
Remote Solar
303 505-8760
 On 2/13/20 1:56 PM, Christopher Warfel
wrote:  

Ray, I spent a bit of time today with a person who inspects for
several state renewable energy programs and to summarize, this person said
the opposite of what you said, and finish saying "seems pretty clear cut".
We did review three sections of 690, and one from 705. I pointed out that
these are not controlled conductors as I interpret them but they should
have been defined. I did not see any earlier posts regarding this, so I
apologize for the redundancy.  On 2/13/2020 3:16 PM, Ray wrote:  

This has
been discussed to death in previous Wrench strings. Just to cut to the
chase: 

please review NEC 2017, Figure 690.1(b) Note:(2). _The PV system
disconnect in these diagrams separates the PV system from all other
systems._

The inverter, charge controller, batteries etc are no longer
part of article 690, and are not subject to its requirements. Look at
articles 705, 706, and 480 for guidance for those _other systems_. 
_Ray
Walters_
Remote Solar
303 505-8760
 On 2/13/20 12:55 PM, Dave Angelini
Offgrid Solar wrote:  
Hi Chris,

A few times and my back-up with a
schneider system is their rapid
shutdown. In the end the inspector comes
around and realizes there is
little gain for an offgrid ground mounted
array for fireman. You do have to
educate them and if they are insistent on
being a bonehead, install the RS
for the inspection and then use the box
for the next one or sell it.

 After almost 30 years offgrid the last thing
I want is something that can
fault out the solar or worse when I am away.
Networks can be the enemy at
times. Less is more offgrid in my
opinion.

Dave Angelini Offgrid Solar
"we go where powerlines
don't"
http://members.sti.net/offgridsolar/ [3]
e-mail [email protected]
[4]
text 209 813 0060

On Thu, 13 Feb 2020 13:07:53 -0500, Christopher
Warfel
 [5] wrote:

I got involved in a long discussion on Rapid Shutdown
compliance for 
battery multimode, grid interconnect inverters that have a
ground 
mounted array. At one point, ground mounted array was not supposed
to 
be subject to Rapid Shutdown unless there were dc conductors on the

building. NEC 2017 seems to say it is if conductors are 3' in or on

buildings. The intent of Rapid Shutdown was supposed to protect fire

fighters from exposure to high dc voltage when the array was on a roof.

Every code cycle it morphs into something a little different. Has 
anyone
had to confront this situation, and was this type of project 
subject to
Rapid Shutdown? Thanks in advance for any clarity on this.

Chris

_______________________________________________
List sponsored by
Redwood Alliance

List Address: [email protected]
[6]

Change listserver email address  border-left:#1010ff 2px solid;
margin-left:5px; width:100%"> 
List rules &
etiquette:
www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm [9]

Check out or update
participant bios:
www.members.re-wrenches.org
[10]

_______________________________________________
List sponsored by
Redwood Alliance

List Address: [email protected]
[11]

Change listserver email address &
settings:
http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org
[12]

List-Archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/maillist.html
[13]

List rules & etiquette:
www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm [14]

Check
out or update participant bios:
www.members.re-wrenches.org
[15]

_______________________________________________
List sponsored by
Redwood Alliance

List Address: [email protected]
[16]

Change listserver email address &
settings:
http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org
[17]

List-Archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/maillist.html
[18]

List rules & etiquette:
www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm [19]

Check
out or update participant bios:
www.members.re-wrenches.org
[20]

_______________________________________________
List sponsored by
Redwood Alliance

List Address: [email protected]
[21]

Change listserver email address &
settings:
http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org
[22]

List-Archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/maillist.html
[23]

List rules & etiquette:
www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm [24]

Check
out or update participant bios:
www.members.re-wrenches.org
[25]

_______________________________________________
List sponsored by
Redwood Alliance

List Address: [email protected]
[26]

Change listserver email address &
settings:
http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org
[27]

List-Archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/maillist.html
[28]

List rules & etiquette:
www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm [29]

Check
out or update participant bios:
www.members.re-wrenches.org
[30]

_______________________________________________
List sponsored by
Redwood Alliance

List Address: [email protected]
[31]

Change listserver email address &
settings:
http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org
[32]

List-Archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/maillist.html
[33]

List rules & etiquette:
www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm [34]

Check
out or update participant bios:
www.members.re-wrenches.org [35]

 


Links:
------
[1] http://members.sti.net/offgridsolar/
[2]
mailto:[email protected]
[3] http://members.sti.net/offgridsolar/
[4]
mailto:[email protected]
[5] mailto:[email protected]
[6]
mailto:[email protected]
[7]
http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org
[8]
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/maillist.html
[9]
http://www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm
[10]
http://www.members.re-wrenches.org
[11]
mailto:[email protected]
[12]
http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org
[13]
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/maillist.html
[14]
http://www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm
[15]
http://www.members.re-wrenches.org
[16]
mailto:[email protected]
[17]
http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org
[18]
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/maillist.html
[19]
http://www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm
[20]
http://www.members.re-wrenches.org
[21]
mailto:[email protected]
[22]
http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org
[23]
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/maillist.html
[24]
http://www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm
[25]
http://www.members.re-wrenches.org
[26]
mailto:[email protected]
[27]
http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org
[28]
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/maillist.html
[29]
http://www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm
[30]
http://www.members.re-wrenches.org
[31]
mailto:[email protected]
[32]
http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org
[33]
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/maillist.html
[34]
http://www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm
[35]
http://www.members.re-wrenches.org
_______________________________________________
List sponsored by Redwood Alliance

List Address: [email protected]

Change listserver email address & settings:
http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

List-Archive: 
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/maillist.html

List rules & etiquette:
www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm

Check out or update participant bios:
www.members.re-wrenches.org

Reply via email to