Hi, I am the wife of Bruce and I have to tell you that my beloved husband
had a fatal accident. Sylvia

On Fri, 14 Feb 2020 at 13:27, Dave Angelini Offgrid Solar <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Unfortunately Ray I have had 2 cases where the Local building inspector
> thought that it was a wildfire risk to not have RS, and yes on a ground
> mount. Too long to go into here but in the rurals where my clients are, it
> can be easier to comply.
>
> After about 4 phone calls it was easier to just do what he wanted and then
> make the change after inspection. Hope others do not have this issue.
>
>
>
> *Dave Angelini Offgrid Solar*
>
> *"we go where powerlines don't"
> http://members.sti.net/offgridsolar/ <http://members.sti.net/offgridsolar/>
> e-mail  [email protected] <[email protected]>
> text 209 813 0060*
>
> On Thu, 13 Feb 2020 15:07:52 -0700, Ray <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Here's a page I put in my plan sets to make its clear for the AHJ.  I have
> not had this challenged, and we have never implemented Rapid Shutdown on a
> ground mounted array.
>
>
>
> Ray Walters
> Remote Solar
> 303 505-8760
>
> On 2/13/20 2:57 PM, Christopher Warfel wrote:
>
> This points out the problem of inconsistent interpretation due in part to
> conflicting or unclear language. I always like to ask how many basements
> have protection around the NM conductors running through and along the
> rafters. I know several people on CMPs are on this listserv.  I am hoping
> that they can add some clear language, and not leave it to a footnote for
> implementing this aspect of the NEC.
> On 2/13/2020 4:42 PM, Ray wrote:
>
> It all comes down to where you install the PV disconnect.  We put it on
> the wall before the conductors enter the building or at the array,
> therefore 690 doesn't apply.  Proper signage is required indicating
> multiple power sources and listing the locations of their disconnects.
>
> Also, this isn't just my opinion, many others on the list have said this,
> including folks involved in the code writing process, and the code says
> this.  The fact that your inspector didn't catch the note on the figure is
> to be expected, as it is not out in flashing neon lights.  It is however a
> clear statement of where 690 stops: at the PV disconnect.
>
> Unfortunately, this is not further clarified in 2020 from what I can tell,
> so we will all continue to suffer inspectors incorrectly expecting 690.12
> on ground mounted systems.  I would politely ask your inspector to review
> that ruling with his higher ups.  We can't start setting precedents that
> are unreasonable and incorrect.  The array wiring is already required to be
> protected by either height, protective panels or fencing.
>
> Ray Walters
> Remote Solar
> 303 505-8760
>
> On 2/13/20 1:56 PM, Christopher Warfel wrote:
>
> Ray, I spent a bit of time today with a person who inspects for several
> state renewable energy programs and to summarize, this person said the
> opposite of what you said, and finish saying "seems pretty clear cut".  We
> did review three sections of 690, and one from 705.  I pointed out that
> these are not controlled conductors as I interpret them but they should
> have been defined.   I did not see any earlier posts regarding this, so I
> apologize for the redundancy.
> On 2/13/2020 3:16 PM, Ray wrote:
>
> This has been discussed to death in previous Wrench strings.  Just to cut
> to the chase:
>
> please review NEC 2017, Figure 690.1(b) Note:(2). *The PV system
> disconnect in these diagrams separates the PV system from all other
> systems.*
>
> The inverter, charge controller, batteries etc are no longer part of
> article 690, and are not subject to its requirements.  Look at articles
> 705, 706, and 480 for guidance for those *other systems*.
>
> *Ray Walters*
> Remote Solar
> 303 505-8760
>
> On 2/13/20 12:55 PM, Dave Angelini Offgrid Solar wrote:
>
> Hi Chris,
>
> A few times and my back-up with a schneider system is their rapid
> shutdown. In the end the inspector comes around and realizes there is
> little gain for an offgrid ground mounted array for fireman. You do have to
> educate them and if they are insistent on being a bonehead, install the RS
> for the inspection and then use the box for the next one or sell it.
>
>  After almost 30 years offgrid the last thing I want is something that can
> fault out the solar or worse when I am away. Networks can be the enemy at
> times. Less is more offgrid in my opinion.
>
>
> Dave Angelini Offgrid Solar
> "we go where powerlines don't"http://members.sti.net/offgridsolar/
> e-mail [email protected]
> text 209 813 0060
>
> On Thu, 13 Feb 2020 13:07:53 -0500, Christopher 
> Warfel<[email protected]> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> I got involved in a long discussion on Rapid Shutdown compliance for
> battery multimode, grid interconnect inverters that have a ground
> mounted array.  At one point, ground mounted array was not supposed to
> be subject to Rapid Shutdown unless there were dc conductors on the
> building.  NEC 2017 seems to say it is if conductors are 3' in or on
> buildings.  The intent of Rapid Shutdown was supposed to protect fire
> fighters from exposure to high dc voltage when the array was on a roof.
> Every code cycle it morphs into something a little different.  Has
> anyone had to confront this situation, and was this type of project
> subject to Rapid Shutdown?  Thanks in advance for any clarity on this.
> Chris
>
> _______________________________________________
> List sponsored by Redwood Alliance
>
> List Address: [email protected]
>
> Change listserver email address & 
> settings:http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org
>
> List-Archive:
>
>
> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/maillist.html
>
> List rules & etiquette:www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm
>
> Check out or update participant bios:www.members.re-wrenches.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> List sponsored by Redwood Alliance
>
> List Address: [email protected]
>
> Change listserver email address & 
> settings:http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org
>
> List-Archive: 
> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/maillist.html
>
> List rules & etiquette:www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm
>
> Check out or update participant bios:www.members.re-wrenches.org
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> List sponsored by Redwood Alliance
>
> List Address: [email protected]
>
> Change listserver email address & 
> settings:http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org
>
> List-Archive: 
> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/maillist.html
>
> List rules & etiquette:www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm
>
> Check out or update participant bios:www.members.re-wrenches.org
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> List sponsored by Redwood Alliance
>
> List Address: [email protected]
>
> Change listserver email address & 
> settings:http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org
>
> List-Archive: 
> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/maillist.html
>
> List rules & etiquette:www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm
>
> Check out or update participant bios:www.members.re-wrenches.org
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> List sponsored by Redwood Alliance
>
> List Address: [email protected]
>
> Change listserver email address & 
> settings:http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org
>
> List-Archive: 
> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/maillist.html
>
> List rules & etiquette:www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm
>
> Check out or update participant bios:www.members.re-wrenches.org
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> List sponsored by Redwood Alliance
>
> List Address: [email protected]
>
> Change listserver email address & 
> settings:http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org
>
> List-Archive: 
> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/maillist.html
>
> List rules & etiquette:www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm
>
> Check out or update participant bios:www.members.re-wrenches.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> List sponsored by Redwood Alliance
>
> List Address: [email protected]
>
> Change listserver email address & settings:
> http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org
>
> List-Archive:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/maillist.html
>
> List rules & etiquette:
> www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm
>
> Check out or update participant bios:
> www.members.re-wrenches.org
>
>
_______________________________________________
List sponsored by Redwood Alliance

List Address: [email protected]

Change listserver email address & settings:
http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

List-Archive: 
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/maillist.html

List rules & etiquette:
www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm

Check out or update participant bios:
www.members.re-wrenches.org

Reply via email to