I would give a small amount of additional time to convince the
inspector. After that I would build the fence he wants. I would also build
it to be easily dismantled/removed. Good Luck!  

Dave Angelini Offgrid
Solar
"we go where powerlines don't"
http://members.sti.net/offgridsolar/
[1]
e-mail [email protected] [2]
text 209 813 0060

On Sat, 18 Jul 2020
10:05:49 -0400, Kirk Herander  wrote:  Thanks all. The NEC reference 110.27
is helpful.   I am in a battle now with my AHJ building inspector which
relates indirectly to the 8' rule question. I have mounted several modules
awning-style above a window at an angle of 30 degrees. The bottom of the
array is 7' from grade. The inspector insists that this is a ground-mount
array, even though it is mounted on the wall of a habitable building. He
cites NFPA 1, 2012 fire safety rules which are adopted in my locale. In his
brain, I must add a fence to insure no one can touch the array within 10'
per NFPA access guidelines for ground-mounts.   The NFPA does not cover
wall-mounts specifically, if at all. It only defines arrays on buildings
(roof) and "real" ground mounts, i.e. mounted on a detached structure.  The
exposed PV wire enters a J-box roughly 10' above grade(behind the array),
more than complying with guidance in NEC 110.27. I am using this rule as
backup to my position that NFPA fire safety rules for ground mounts do not
apply, and the wire runs are protected accordingly per the NEC. IMO the
intent of the NFPA 10' ground-mount rule is to protect the array and
specifically wiring from damage, which compliance with NEC 110.27 already
does.

On 7/18/2020 4:01:34 AM, Martin Herzfeld  wrote:   Simply, the '2.5
m' (8 ft) has been inferred from Article 110.27(A)(4). It's interesting now
that the distance in the 2019 CEC/2017 NEC has increased based on voltage.
In other words, if the voltage is greater than 301 volts the minimum would
be 8 ft 6 in. :)

 All the best, 

Martin Herzfeld, Interstate Renewable
Energy Council (IREC) Certified Master Trainer (tm) for Photovoltaics (PV)
Installation Professional #IREC 10037
Contract Training Provider
(CTP)
Adjunct Professor, Energy

California Solar & Electrical Contractor
License #00833782 C46, C10, D56, D31, C-7
Solar, Electrical, Trenching,
Pole Installation  border-left: 1px #ccc solid; padding-left: 1ex;"> Hi
Kirk - We work in San Francisco where they have a local code amendment: [4]
 300.4(I) Add the following section:   (I) Subject to Physical Damage.
Premises wiring systems installed less than 2.44 m (8 feet) above a walking
surface or finished floor are considered subject to physical damage.   As
far as I'm aware otherwise, there is not a specific definition specifying
8' for physical damage in the broader NEC - I think it's just up to the
AHJ.   August Luminalt       

  On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 8:38 AM Kirk
Herander  wrote:  All,   Is there a reference to this so-called "8-foot
rule" that someone could point me to in the NEC? Thanks. 
_______________________________________________
 List sponsored by Redwood
Alliance

 List Address: [email protected] [6]

 Change
listserver email address & settings:

http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org [7]


List-Archive:
http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org [8]


List rules & etiquette:
 www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm [9]

 Check out
or update participant bios:
 www.members.re-wrenches.org [10]
  
_______________________________________________
 List sponsored by Redwood
Alliance

 List Address: [email protected] [11]

 Change
listserver email address & settings:

http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org [12]


List-Archive:
http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org [13]


List rules & etiquette:
 www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm [14]

 Check out
or update participant bios:
 www.members.re-wrenches.org [15]
    
_______________________________________________ List sponsored by Redwood
Alliance List Address: [email protected] Change listserver
email address & settings:
http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org
List-Archive:
http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org List
rules & etiquette: www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm Check out or update
participant bios: www.members.re-wrenches.org    

Links:
------
[1]
http://members.sti.net/offgridsolar/
[2] mailto:[email protected]
[3]
mailto:[email protected]
[4]
https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/san_francisco/latest/sf_building/0-0-0-84935
[5]
mailto:[email protected]
[6] mailto:[email protected]
[7]
http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org
[8]
http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org
[9]
http://www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm
[10]
http://www.members.re-wrenches.org
[11]
mailto:[email protected]
[12]
http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org
[13]
http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org
[14]
http://www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm
[15]
http://www.members.re-wrenches.org
_______________________________________________
List sponsored by Redwood Alliance

List Address: [email protected]

Change listserver email address & settings:
http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

List-Archive: http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

List rules & etiquette:
www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm

Check out or update participant bios:
www.members.re-wrenches.org

Reply via email to