I've always interpreted this rule to mean to the wiring, not to the bottom edge of the array.  110.27  refers to live parts; that's actual uninsulated  bare conductors, lugs, or switch contacts, etc.  Further, 690.31(A) just says "circuit conductors shall be guarded...."  Finally, if the conductors are within 8 ft of the ground, then usually you can just put a plastic shield, or expanded aluminum lathe on the bottom of the rails to protect the conductors.

Wire Shielding ground Mount

I pinched this pic from Miller Solar, one of our long time wrenches here.


Ray Walters
Remote Solar
303 505-8760

On 7/18/20 3:57 PM, Dave Angelini Offgrid Solar wrote:

I would give a small amount of additional time to convince the inspector. After that I would build the fence he wants. I would also build it to be easily dismantled/removed. Good Luck!

*Dave Angelini Offgrid Solar "we go where powerlines don't" http://members.sti.net/offgridsolar/ e-mail [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> text 209 813 0060*

On Sat, 18 Jul 2020 10:05:49 -0400, Kirk Herander <[email protected]> wrote:

Thanks all. The NEC reference 110.27 is helpful.
I am in a battle now with my AHJ building inspector which relates indirectly to the 8' rule question. I have mounted several modules awning-style above a window at an angle of 30 degrees. The bottom of the array is 7' from grade. The inspector insists that this is a ground-mount array, even though it is mounted on the wall of a habitable building. He cites NFPA 1, 2012 fire safety rules which are adopted in my locale. In his brain, I must add a fence to insure no one can touch the array within 10' per NFPA access guidelines for ground-mounts. The NFPA does not cover wall-mounts specifically, if at all. It only defines arrays on buildings (roof) and "real" ground mounts, i.e. mounted on a detached structure. The exposed PV wire enters a J-box roughly 10' above grade(behind the array), more than complying with guidance in NEC 110.27. I am using this rule as backup to my position that NFPA fire safety rules for ground mounts do not apply, and the wire runs are protected accordingly per the NEC. IMO the intent of the NFPA 10' ground-mount rule is to protect the array and specifically wiring from damage, which compliance with NEC 110.27 already does.

    On 7/18/2020 4:01:34 AM, Martin Herzfeld <[email protected]>
    wrote:

    Simply, the '2.5 m' (8 ft) has been inferred from Article
    110.27(A)(4).  It's interesting now that the distance in the 2019
    CEC/2017 NEC has  increased based on voltage.  In other words, if
    the voltage is greater than 301 volts the minimum would be 8 ft 6
    in. :)

    All the best,

    Martin Herzfeld, Interstate Renewable Energy Council (IREC)
    Certified Master Trainer ™ for Photovoltaics (PV) Installation
    Professional #IREC 10037
    Contract Training Provider (CTP)
    Adjunct Professor, Energy

    California Solar & Electrical Contractor License  #00833782  C46,
    C10, D56, D31, C-7
    Solar, Electrical, Trenching, Pole Installation & Maintenance,
    Instrumentation

    Contract Solar (PV) Technical Inspector - 3rd Party Inspections
    Underwriters Laboratories (UL) Certified PV Installer #17, OSHA 30
    OSHA-Authorized Construction Trainer #32-0105338
    CompTIA Certified Technical Classroom Trainer (CTT+)
    #T3NSZCNBBKB4QTQG

    * Professional Member, International Association of Electrical
    Inspectors  #7035507 - Since 2006
    * Accredited and Registered North American Board of Certified
    Energy Practitioners (NABCEP) Continuing Education (CE) Training
    Provider

    On Fri, Jul 17, 2020, 7:32 PM August Goers <[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

        Hi Kirk - We work in San Francisco where they have a local
        code amendment:
        
<https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/san_francisco/latest/sf_building/0-0-0-84935>

        300.4(I) Add the following section:
         (I)   Subject to Physical Damage. Premises wiring systems
        installed less than 2.44 m (8 feet) above a walking surface
        or finished floor are considered subject to physical damage.
        As far as I'm aware otherwise, there is not a specific
        definition specifying 8' for physical damage in the broader
        NEC - I think it's just up to the AHJ.
        August
        Luminalt


        On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 8:38 AM Kirk Herander
        <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

            All,
            Is there a reference to this so-called "8-foot rule" that
            someone could point me to in the NEC? Thanks.
            _______________________________________________
            List sponsored by Redwood Alliance

            List Address: [email protected]
            <mailto:[email protected]>

            Change listserver email address & settings:
            http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

            List-Archive:
            http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

            List rules & etiquette:
            www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm
            <http://www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm>

            Check out or update participant bios:
            www.members.re-wrenches.org
            <http://www.members.re-wrenches.org>

        _______________________________________________
        List sponsored by Redwood Alliance

        List Address: [email protected]
        <mailto:[email protected]>

        Change listserver email address & settings:
        http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

        List-Archive:
        http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

        List rules & etiquette:
        www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm
        <http://www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm>

        Check out or update participant bios:
        www.members.re-wrenches.org <http://www.members.re-wrenches.org>

    _______________________________________________ List sponsored by
    Redwood Alliance List Address: [email protected]
    Change listserver email address & settings:
    http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org
    List-Archive:
    http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org
    List rules & etiquette: www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm Check
    out or update participant bios: www.members.re-wrenches.org


_______________________________________________
List sponsored by Redwood Alliance

List Address: [email protected]

Change listserver email address & settings:
http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

List-Archive: http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

List rules & etiquette:
www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm

Check out or update participant bios:
www.members.re-wrenches.org

_______________________________________________
List sponsored by Redwood Alliance

List Address: [email protected]

Change listserver email address & settings:
http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

List-Archive: http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

List rules & etiquette:
www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm

Check out or update participant bios:
www.members.re-wrenches.org

Reply via email to