There’s the inverter max output amps, that’s it. 290 watts for either the 7 a or 7+ on the 208 VAC, they’re equal for sure. So put on a 420 watt panel but don’t expect to make a bit more production midday, all you get is a bit quicker ramp up in the AM and a bit longer 290w output in the evening. I’d put something in the 320 to 350 w range on these micros, max. We are in a cooler climate too maybe than most, around the Reno Tahoe area. I have LG 310’s on S280’s that are seeing flattening on the Enlighten output graphs midday now in the spring.
Chris Worcester Solar Wind Works NABCEP PV Installation Professional Cell 530-448-9692 www.solarwindworks.com [email protected] From: RE-wrenches <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Jay Sent: Wednesday, March 03, 2021 12:46 PM To: RE-wrenches <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [RE-wrenches] Enphase IQ7A 3 phase limitations Emphase has a white paper showing production vs module size and locations around the country. I don’t know if it’s more accurate than pv watts but you might check it out. Jay Peltz power. On Mar 3, 2021, at 12:13 PM, Jason Szumlanski <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > wrote: I'm wondering how accurate the DC to AC ratio is when using PVWATTS. I did a quick PVWATTS analysis at my local area using a typical commercial roof tilt and found that using a 420W module on an IQ7A versus a 385W module on an IQ7+ yields almost identical results. The 420W module has 1% less annual production at to the 145% ratio compared to the 132% ratio with the 385W module. Given that, I can't imagine why anyone would use the IQ7A versus the IQ7+ on a 208V system. Why incur the additional cost if the AC output current is identical for both inverters? If PVWATTS is right, I guess it's a non-issue in my local area, but it may vary in other locations where clipping is more common. The heat here results in little clipping at a 132% ratio here, and I guess at 145% the morning and afternoon advantages largely outweigh the mid-day clipping increase. Jason Szumlanski <https://mailtrack.io/trace/mail/5eb252f6e6d870638e7a0fd58093488ac94a581b.png?u=1613865> On Tue, Mar 2, 2021 at 10:00 AM Jason Szumlanski <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > wrote: I was surprised to learn that the IQ7A is limited to 290 W continuous at 208 volts. That pretty much puts Enphase out of the running for light commercial jobs with new high-powered 72 cell panels. Any thoughts on this? Jason _______________________________________________ List sponsored by Redwood Alliance List Address: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> Change listserver email address & settings: http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org There are two list archives for searching. When one doesn't work, try the other: https://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org List rules & etiquette: http://www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm Check out or update participant bios: http://www.members.re-wrenches.org
_______________________________________________ List sponsored by Redwood Alliance List Address: [email protected] Change listserver email address & settings: http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org There are two list archives for searching. When one doesn't work, try the other: https://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org List rules & etiquette: http://www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm Check out or update participant bios: http://www.members.re-wrenches.org
