I'd 2nd using the Polaris and similar insulated block connectors. Easy
to make a good connection, easy to test voltage without disturbing the
connection, easy to double check connection torque, and easy to
reverse. They are direct burial rated, although I've never actually
felt that confident.
I've actually seen a couple of fires started with split bolts, so I feel
those need to go the way of the dinosaurs. That's probably a hundred
year old connector, are very difficult to check after being taped, can't
check voltage, and the sharp edges can short through the tape, if not
really done well.
Ray Walters
Remote Solar
303 505-8760
On 4/26/21 11:16 PM, frenergy wrote:
Blake,
Its great to get definitive clarification on this MC4/THHN
issue, we've been using 4-14 Polaris connectors with good results.
Being inside a Nema3 can and having silicone grease in the Polaris
makes for a solid, durable connection. Inspecting some of these that
are now 17 years in the field shows very good condition for the wire
landing in the Polaris and the condition of THWN-2 wire insulation.
We haven't had the best of luck with Buchanans.
Bill
Feather River Solar Electric
Bill Battagin, Owner
4291 Nelson St.
Taylorsville, CA 95983
530.284.7849
CA Lic 874049
www.frenergy.net
On 4/26/2021 5:41 PM, Blake Gleason wrote:
Corey,
Thank you! Agreed, the message from Staubli's Eng dept is much less
confusing (with the exception of the statement about THHN tending to
be solid vs stranded).
All -
What are you folks using to transition from PV Wire to THHN/THWN-2
inside a junction box? We used to use split bolts, which make an
awesome electrical connection, but are time-consuming and not easily
serviceable. Wire nuts (the right ones) are Listed, but never felt
reliable for that purpose. Same for WAGO levers. I hear about people
using Buchanan splice caps, but I wonder about trading one set of
crimping problems for another. And of course, the only problem with
using THHN in an MC4 is that the compression gland may not be as
watertight as it is with PVWire, and the Buchanans certainly are not
watertight. Terminal blocks generally aren't listed, definitely
aren't watertight, and raise inspectors' eyebrows. Why is this so
hard for me??
Best,
Blake
Thanks
_______________________________________________
List sponsored by Redwood Alliance
Pay optional member dues here: http://re-wrenches.org
List Address: [email protected]
Change listserver email address & settings:
http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org
There are two list archives for searching. When one doesn't work, try the other:
https://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org
List rules & etiquette:
http://www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm
Check out or update participant bios:
http://www.members.re-wrenches.org
