On 2/11/06, Doug Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Sorry man,
It's alpha software! :)
I really want to get the point where I can nail down the API that will exist
for 1.0. At that point we'll move to beta and the API will not change till
1.1 (at least).
Doug
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of João
Fernandes
Sent: Saturday, February 11, 2006 6:41 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Reactor For CF coldspring
Doug, You never stop...
I'm saying this but I till now I was never disapointed ;)
João Fernandes
PS: I'm getting as many messages from reactor as from flexcoders, it seems
this list is very healthy ;)
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Doug Hughes
Sent: Sat 11-Feb-06 11:20 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Reactor For CF coldspring
Kurt,
FYI, the reactor factory config/constructor's api may be changing soon
slightly. Joe R. did some work on it that I haven't yet reviewed. You may
want to discuss this with him.
Doug
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Kurt
Wiersma
Sent: Saturday, February 11, 2006 6:16 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Reactor For CF coldspring
By popular request I have implemented factory-bean/factory-method
support for ColdSpring. Currently this is in bleeding edge CVS area
only. This allows ColdSpring to work with your own custom factories
either for legacy reasons, or to support external factories like
Reactor.
Here is an example of how would use this new feature with Reactor.
<bean id="reactorFactory" class="reactor.reactorFactory ">
<constructor-arg
name="reactorConfig"><value>${reactorConfig}</value></constructor-arg>
<property name="dsn"><value>${dsn}</value></property>
</bean>
<bean id="playerDAO"
factory-bean="reactorFactory"
factory-method="createDAO">
<constructor-arg
name="name"><value>players</value></constructor-arg>
</bean>
<bean id="playerGateway"
factory-bean="reactorFactory"
factory-method="createGateway">
<constructor-arg
name="name"><value>players</value></constructor-arg>
</bean>
<bean id="playerService"
class="fantasyfootball.model.player.playerService " />
Hopefully we will have some news soon about the next official release.
--Kurt
On 1/31/06, Kurt Wiersma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This addition to ColdSpring is planned for the next release. I am not done
> with it yet though so I don't where or not it will make the next release
> which may be in the next couple of weeks (depending on how testing goes).
I
> know this feature has been requested by several people outside of reactor
> for use with their custom factories.
>
> --Kurt
>
>
> On 1/31/06, Sam Clement <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Doh... Just re-read Kurt's first comment (and looked at the Coldspring
> documentation that states factory-bean and factory-method are planned but
> not yet implemented), hence Joe's comment.
> >
> > Kurt, are you working on this as a part of an 'official' coldspring
> release? Anyway, good luck, sounds great!
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On 1/30/06, Kurt Wiersma < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > >
>
http://static.springframework.org/spring/docs/1.2.x/reference/beans.html#bea
ns-instance-factory-method
> > >
> > > Basically ColdSpring will control the Reactor factory for you. Here is
> > > an example from my config file:
> > >
> > > <bean id="reactorFactory" class=" reactor.reactorFactory">
> > > <constructor-arg
> > >
> name="reactorConfig"><value>${reactorConfig}</value></constructor-arg>
> > > <property
> name="dsn"><value>${dsn}</value></property>
> > > </bean>
> > >
> > > <bean id="fantasyTeamDAO"
> > > factory-bean="reactorFactory"
> factory-method="createDAO">
> > > <constructor-arg
> name="name"><value>fantasyteams</value></constructor-arg>
> > > </bean>
> > >
> > > <bean id="fantasyteamService"
> > >
> class="fantasyfootball.model.fantasyteam.fantasyteamService">
> > > <property name="fantasyTeamDAO"><ref id="fantasyTeamDAO"
> /></property>
> > > </bean>
> > >
> > > Hopefully this makes a bit more sense.
> > >
> > > On 1/30/06, Seth Petry-Johnson < [EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
> > > > I assumed it meant he was working on a way to configure ColdSpring
to
> > > > delegate the creation of certain objects to a Reactor factory rather
> than
> > > > creating them itself. i.e. getBean("BlahGateway") would end up
> invoking
> > > > reactorFactory.createGateway("Blah").
> > > >
> > > > But I guess I could be out in left field... wouldn't be the first
time
> :)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 1/30/06, Joe Rinehart < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > Hey Kurt,
> > > > >
> > > > > I'm a little lost as to what factory-bean/factory-method support
> > > > > actually means - could you maybe show an example of using the API
> it'd
> > > > > create?
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > >
> > > > > Joe
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
-- Reactor for ColdFusion Mailing List -- [email protected] -- Archives
at http://www.mail-archive.com/reactor%40doughughes.net/
-- Reactor for ColdFusion Mailing List -- [email protected] -- Archives
at http://www.mail-archive.com/reactor%40doughughes.net/
-- Reactor for ColdFusion Mailing List -- [email protected] -- Archives
at http://www.mail-archive.com/reactor%40doughughes.net/
-- Reactor for ColdFusion Mailing List -- [email protected] -- Archives at http://www.mail-archive.com/reactor%40doughughes.net/
-- Reactor for ColdFusion Mailing List -- [email protected] -- Archives at http://www.mail-archive.com/reactor%40doughughes.net/
