No problem about the API Doug. The great thing about this support in
CS is that it won't be a huge deal if you change the API. I think it
is great that you are very clear the API may change until 1.0. Makes
perfect sense to me.

Keep up the great work!

--Kurt

On 2/12/06, Sam Clement <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Very cool, Kurt.   Downloading now...
>
>
> On 2/11/06, Doug Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Sorry man,
> >
> > It's alpha software! :)
> >
> > I really want to get the point where I can nail down the API that will
> exist
> > for 1.0.  At that point we'll move to beta and the API will not change
> till
> > 1.1 (at least).
> >
> > Doug
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of João
> > Fernandes
> > Sent: Saturday, February 11, 2006 6:41 PM
> > To: [email protected]
> > Subject: RE: Reactor For CF coldspring
> >
> > Doug, You never stop...
> >
> > I'm saying this but I till now I was never disapointed ;)
> >
> > João Fernandes
> >
> > PS: I'm getting as many messages from reactor as from flexcoders, it seems
> > this list is very healthy ;)
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Doug Hughes
> > Sent: Sat 11-Feb-06 11:20 PM
> > To: [email protected]
> > Subject: RE: Reactor For CF coldspring
> >
> > Kurt,
> >
> > FYI, the reactor factory config/constructor's api may be changing soon
> > slightly.  Joe R. did some work on it that I haven't yet reviewed.  You
> may
> > want to discuss this with him.
> >
> > Doug
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kurt
> > Wiersma
> > Sent: Saturday, February 11, 2006 6:16 PM
> > To: [email protected]
> > Subject: Re: Reactor For CF coldspring
> >
> > By popular request I have implemented factory-bean/factory-method
> > support for ColdSpring. Currently this is in bleeding edge CVS area
> > only. This allows ColdSpring to work with your own custom factories
> > either for legacy reasons, or to support external factories like
> > Reactor.
> >
> > Here is an example of how would use this new feature with Reactor.
> >
> > <bean id="reactorFactory" class="reactor.reactorFactory ">
> >                 <constructor-arg
> >
> name="reactorConfig"><value>${reactorConfig}</value></constructor-arg>
> >                 <property
> name="dsn"><value>${dsn}</value></property>
> >         </bean>
> >
> > <bean id="playerDAO"
> >                         factory-bean="reactorFactory"
> > factory-method="createDAO">
> >                 <constructor-arg
> > name="name"><value>players</value></constructor-arg>
> >         </bean>
> >         <bean id="playerGateway"
> >                         factory-bean="reactorFactory"
> > factory-method="createGateway">
> >                 <constructor-arg
> > name="name"><value>players</value></constructor-arg>
> >         </bean>
> >
> >         <bean id="playerService"
> > class="fantasyfootball.model.player.playerService " />
> >
> > Hopefully we will have some news soon about the next official release.
> >
> > --Kurt
> >
> > On 1/31/06, Kurt Wiersma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > This addition to ColdSpring is planned for the next release. I am not
> done
> > > with it yet though so I don't where or not it will make the next release
> > > which may be in the next couple of weeks (depending on how testing
> goes).
> > I
> > > know this feature has been requested by several people outside of
> reactor
> > > for use with their custom factories.
> > >
> > > --Kurt
> > >
> > >
> > > On 1/31/06, Sam Clement <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Doh... Just re-read Kurt's first comment (and looked at the Coldspring
> > > documentation that states factory-bean and factory-method are planned
> but
> > > not yet implemented), hence Joe's comment.
> > > >
> > > > Kurt, are you working on this as a part of an 'official' coldspring
> > > release?  Anyway, good luck, sounds great!
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 1/30/06, Kurt Wiersma < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > >
> > >
> >
> http://static.springframework.org/spring/docs/1.2.x/reference/beans.html#bea
> > ns-instance-factory-method
> > > > >
> > > > > Basically ColdSpring will control the Reactor factory for you. Here
> is
> > > > > an example from my config file:
> > > > >
> > > > > <bean id="reactorFactory" class=" reactor.reactorFactory">
> > > > >                 <constructor-arg
> > > > >
> > >
> name="reactorConfig"><value>${reactorConfig}</value></constructor-arg>
> > > > >                 <property
> > > name="dsn"><value>${dsn}</value></property>
> > > > >         </bean>
> > > > >
> > > > > <bean id="fantasyTeamDAO"
> > > > >                         factory-bean="reactorFactory"
> > > factory-method="createDAO">
> > > > >                 <constructor-arg
> > >
> name="name"><value>fantasyteams</value></constructor-arg>
> > > > >         </bean>
> > > > >
> > > > >         <bean id="fantasyteamService"
> > > > >
> > >
> class="fantasyfootball.model.fantasyteam.fantasyteamService">
> > > > >    <property name="fantasyTeamDAO"><ref id="fantasyTeamDAO"
> > > /></property>
> > > > > </bean>
> > > > >
> > > > > Hopefully this makes a bit more sense.
> > > > >
> > > > > On 1/30/06, Seth Petry-Johnson < [EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
> > > > > > I assumed it meant he was working on a way to configure ColdSpring
> > to
> > > > > > delegate the creation of certain objects to a Reactor factory
> rather
> > > than
> > > > > > creating them itself.  i.e. getBean("BlahGateway") would end up
> > > invoking
> > > > > > reactorFactory.createGateway("Blah").
> > > > > >
> > > > > > But I guess I could be out in left field... wouldn't be the first
> > time
> > > :)
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On 1/30/06, Joe Rinehart < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > > > Hey Kurt,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I'm a little lost as to what factory-bean/factory-method support
> > > > > > > actually means - could you maybe show an example of using the
> API
> > > it'd
> > > > > > > create?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Joe
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > -- Reactor for ColdFusion Mailing List -- [email protected] --
> Archives
> > at http://www.mail-archive.com/reactor%40doughughes.net/
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > -- Reactor for ColdFusion Mailing List -- [email protected] --
> Archives
> > at http://www.mail-archive.com/reactor%40doughughes.net/
> >
> >
> > -- Reactor for ColdFusion Mailing List -- [email protected] --
> Archives
> > at http://www.mail-archive.com/reactor%40doughughes.net/
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > -- Reactor for ColdFusion Mailing List -- [email protected] --
> Archives at
> http://www.mail-archive.com/reactor%40doughughes.net/
> >
> >
>
>  -- Reactor for ColdFusion Mailing List -- [email protected] --
> Archives at
> http://www.mail-archive.com/reactor%40doughughes.net/



-- Reactor for ColdFusion Mailing List -- [email protected] -- Archives at 
http://www.mail-archive.com/reactor%40doughughes.net/

Reply via email to