1. I've started that Wiki for myself in the first place, but
everybody is welcome.
2. I started it in order to come to grips with Reactor (that hasn't
happened completely yet, mainly because I lack the time to
concentrate on Reactor), which was a project in a very unfinished
state at that time.
3. I don't think the Wikipedia is the best (or even a good) place to
try and document a work in progress.
4. I think Wikis are great to flesh out the structure and main
content of "a body of knowledge" on a specific theme.
But let's not argue over where to put a Wiki (or another tool);
Reactor deserves better.
W.
On Apr 28, 2006, at 16:16, Adrocknaphobia wrote:
If you are going to start a wiki without Doug's involvement, why not
just start a stub on Wikipedia?
-Adam
On 4/27/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Doug is not a Wiki fan, but I am - and that's why Reactor already
has a
Wiki: http://reactor.wikispaces.com/
Now don't get me wrong: I'm not saying that a Wiki is the best and
only way
to go (on the contrary) - but it may help to organize the
knowledge floating
about on the mailing list and on blogs. If necessary, write access
to the
Reactor Wiki can be limited, if I understand the Wikispaces
configuration
correctly.
So if somebody wants to start jotting down ideas, outlines, code
samples,
...: be my guest. And if not - no problem, really.
Wouter
On Apr 26, 2006, at 15:08, Brian Kotek wrote:
One option might be a private Wiki where people with Reactor
knowledge can
collaborate and build up the docs that way. Just an idea that
seems like it
would be easier than trying to coordinate multiple people working
on the
docs and submitting text to you that would need to be merged
together.
On 4/26/06, Doug Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> Matt – thanks for the volunteering!
>
>
>
> I've been thinking about how to best handle the docs. I'm going
to be
outlining the whole thing first. I might farm out some sections to
volunteers such as you. Either way, I'll probably ask for
volunteers to
proof read specific sections and find errors, etc. Watch this
channel for
more info as I get to that point.
>
>
>
> Doug
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Matt Williams
> Sent: Wednesday, April 26, 2006 8:50 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Reactor For CF] Beta candidate
>
>
>
>
> Hey Doug,
>
> I haven't been active on this list, but have been following
along. I can't
promise I have much time, but I could volunteer to help write some
of the
docs for the 1.0 release. I've played with Reactor here and there
and would
like to learn more about it, so doing some digging and writing
would be a
good way to do this.
>
> If you feel you have this under control, then that's great. But
if you
would like some help, then contact me off list to let me know what
would be
most useful.
>
> Matt Williams
> -- Reactor for ColdFusion Mailing List -- [email protected] --
Archives at
http://www.mail-archive.com/reactor%40doughughes.net/
>
> -- Reactor for ColdFusion Mailing List -- [email protected] --
Archives at
http://www.mail-archive.com/reactor%40doughughes.net/
-- Reactor for ColdFusion Mailing List -- [email protected]
-- Archives
at http://www.mail-archive.com/reactor%40doughughes.net/
-- Reactor for ColdFusion Mailing List -- [email protected]
-- Archives at http://www.mail-archive.com/reactor%40doughughes.net/
-- Reactor for ColdFusion Mailing List -- [email protected]
-- Archives at http://www.mail-archive.com/reactor%40doughughes.net/
