Hi Marc,

Encapsulate what varies, but remember "You Ain't Gonna Need it" (YAGNI).
Bottom line: if you expect to need to jump back and forth between cfcs and
other model file types feel free to encapsulate that variability somewhere
with a façade. If not, you're just adding unnecessary complexity that your
particular application doesn't need.

Best Wishes,
Peter

On 8/16/06 11:42 AM, "Marc Funaro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> To rephrase, shouldn't the controller be sending messages to a central model
> circuit, and have that circuit return back what's expected, without the
> controller needing to understand the implementation used to get what is
> returned to it?






-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
Reactor for ColdFusion Mailing List
[email protected]
Archives at: http://www.mail-archive.com/reactor%40doughughes.net/
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --

Reply via email to