Kartik Agaram:
> Though, now that you mention it, it occurs to me that there's a more
> general criticism of infix. Things like this are confusing:
>
> {some-long-sym - some-other-long-sym}
> {some+long+sym + some+other+long+sym}
It actually doesn't look very confusing to me, but if it is, I think adding
extra whitespace around the operator resolves it:
{some-long-sym - some-other-long-sym}
It probably really only happens much with "-".
An alternative is to use {e}, though I like it less for this case:
{{some-long-sym} - {some-other-long-sym}}
> (- some-long-sym some-other-long-sym)
You can keep doing that, naturally. And what about this?:
-(some-long-sym some-other-long-sym)
--- David A. Wheeler
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
Readable-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/readable-discuss
