Made a bunch of changes on the repo, mostly formatting and splitting
up long lines.
Also, the rationale for #!srfi-105 seemed slightly confusing to me, so
I tried to split some sentences to help clarify things; could you take
a look if that's what you meant?
I added an additional rationale for {e} -> e: it allows { } to be used
for grouping, as in {{{{a} +{b}}}} --> (+ a b)
We should probably be consistent with the use of "map to" vs. ⇒
The section "Other comments on neoteric-expressions" has an id of
"neoteric-comments", but other h2-level headers under rationale have
an id of the form "rationale_something".
I absolutely abhor the numeric &#nnn; thing. If we can't use ',
could ' be replaced with a simple keyboard ASCII single-quote
character, or would that cause problems in some browser/specifications
I didn't know about?
Also, SRFI process requires HTML 3 but our code at the top claims it's 4.01
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
Readable-discuss mailing list
Readable-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/readable-discuss
