Hi Alan, Thank you for your answer!
Am Samstag, 9. Februar 2013, 13:43:23 schrieb Alan Manuel Gloria: > On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 7:47 AM, Arne Babenhauserheide <arne_...@web.de> wrote: > > By prefixing all variables with “.”, it also gets line continuations for > > free: > > > > a b c d e > > . f g h > > . i j k > > > > is equivalent to > > > > (a b c d e > > f g h > > i j k) > > > > Really? Because your rule is: > > > - if it is indented equally, then it closes a bracket and opens a new one > > (except if it starts with a ., then it only closes a bracket). > > So: > (a b c d e > f g h > ) i j k Ouch, yes you’re right - good catch! > ... or something anyway. Maybe "." should raise a flag that > suppresses ")" for the next line. But I think that ends up having a > stack in the case of indentation. > > ...or something, at least. Hehe. Essentially a line starting with . should always continue the previous less-indented line. So the example is what I envision, but my rules do not work for double usage of it. Best wishes, Arne -- 1w6 sie zu achten, sie alle zu finden, in Spiele zu leiten und sacht zu verbinden. → http://1w6.org
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Free Next-Gen Firewall Hardware Offer Buy your Sophos next-gen firewall before the end March 2013 and get the hardware for free! Learn more. http://p.sf.net/sfu/sophos-d2d-feb
_______________________________________________ Readable-discuss mailing list Readable-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/readable-discuss
