Am 19.11.2013 05:38, schrieb David A. Wheeler: >> Am 18.11.2013 15:25, schrieb David A. Wheeler: >>> On Mon, 18 Nov 2013 13:23:32 +0100, "Jörg F. Wittenberger" >>> <joerg.wittenber...@softeyes.net> wrote: >>> >>>> In a first attempt to feed the source to some other Scheme I went ahead >>>> and sent it to the rscheme compiler. >>>> >>>> Doesn't work. It has the same problem as Guile: it will refuse to read >>>> certain #sharp syntax. > Okay, the source code no longer has "#:". > > The result is extremely magical guile code, to work around some wonkiness in > old versions of guile, but the magic is explained in comments. >
Great if this works in guile, rscheme reads it too. I'll be able to make progress. However I have a problem with another change: while all the Scheme's I know process nested cond-expand forms I recall that srfi-0 explicit does not requites this to be the case and suggest to avoid such use. Should be have these nested cond-expand's? Also: often different Scheme's can share different code parts. Enforcing a single cond-expand with nested cond-expands is not only against srfi-10; I can foresee how this will complicate the code and require quite some repetition and confusing logic in those conditions the cond-expand's dispatch on. Let alone that alternatives, which belong logically together are spread around in the file. That's a nightmare to maintain. Hence: I'd prefer to cluster all cond-expands at the beginning, but have one cond-expand per dispatch reason. Comments? Best Regards /Jörg ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Shape the Mobile Experience: Free Subscription Software experts and developers: Be at the forefront of tech innovation. Intel(R) Software Adrenaline delivers strategic insight and game-changing conversations that shape the rapidly evolving mobile landscape. Sign up now. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=63431311&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Readable-discuss mailing list Readable-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/readable-discuss
