On 07 May 2014 21:48:45 +0200, Jörg F. Wittenberger
<joerg.wittenber...@softeyes.net> wrote:
> it just occured to me that |* and *| might be good aliases to <* and *>
> too. If { and } could be problematic.
Those would *look* okay but wouldn't work on many Lisps (Common Lisp, Scheme).
The "|" introduces a literal atom on many Lisps.
> Just: those in turn... hm, does the sweet read code actually rely on the
> read implementation of the underlying Scheme? I had the impression that it
> would read char by char anyway.
There are currently at least 3 current implementations of sweet-expression
readers:
1. The Scheme one (tested mostly with guile)
2. Common Lisp
3. ANTLR/Java implementation (primarily for grammar analysis).
Anyone can always implement another. We want it to be as easy as possible
to implement it, while limiting the difficulties of doing so.
--- David A. Wheeler
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Is your legacy SCM system holding you back? Join Perforce May 7 to find out:
• 3 signs your SCM is hindering your productivity
• Requirements for releasing software faster
• Expert tips and advice for migrating your SCM now
http://p.sf.net/sfu/perforce
_______________________________________________
Readable-discuss mailing list
Readable-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/readable-discuss
