David A. Wheeler scripsit: > Not at all. The whole point is to have a syntax that is general, and > not tied to a particular semantic. Clearly it needs to be useful for > a given semantic, but not tied to it.
Well, indentation can model () or it can model []; it can't do both. In CL or Scheme that doesn't matter, because [] is inessential. In Clojure it's essential. -- John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan co...@ccil.org After fixing the Y2K bug in an application: WELCOME TO <censored> DATE: MONDAK, JANUARK 1, 1900 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Readable-discuss mailing list Readable-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/readable-discuss
