David A. Wheeler scripsit:

> Not at all. The whole point is to have a syntax that is general, and
> not tied to a particular semantic. Clearly it needs to be useful for
> a given semantic, but not tied to it.

Well, indentation can model () or it can model []; it can't do both.
In CL or Scheme that doesn't matter, because [] is inessential.  In
Clojure it's essential.

John Cowan          http://www.ccil.org/~cowan        co...@ccil.org
After fixing the Y2K bug in an application:
        WELCOME TO <censored>
        DATE: MONDAK, JANUARK 1, 1900

Readable-discuss mailing list

Reply via email to