From: Norman Palardy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 10:52:45 -0800
On Feb 15, 2006, at 9:58 AM, Peter K. Stys wrote:
and that's exactly what I do, and my argument why Xcode or equiv will
always be necessary. The other point was the constant little GUI
(and
other) deficiencies that keep creeping in or lingering with each RB
release that makes our lives very difficult and keeps RB from being
used to build a truly hi-powered killer app like Photoshop, with or
without external C/C++ support for the heavy lifting.
Maybe I'm way off BUT it would be nice IF REALbasic were more than
capable enough to do this without needing C/C++.
I rarely write any assembler in C/C++ any more because it's just not
necessary for 99.999% of the tasks I use C/C++ for.
Compilers are pretty darned good and chunk out pretty decent code such
that it works more than fast enough for the task without resorting to
writing assembler.
For RB, C and C++ are the "assembler" equivalents. and it will be nice
to get an RB compiler with enough optimizations, etc that C/C++ are
mostly not needed in the same way.
RB++? It would be like ObjC++, a superset of C++ that includes RB :oD
--
http://elfdata.com/plugin/
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>
Search the archives of this list here:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
