On 2/17/06, ForRbasic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > jon pipitone wrote: > > I'm sorry to bring this topic up again because I know it has been > > mentioned on this list many times with no conclusive answer. (I even > > mentioned it when I was first toying with RB). But, here goes again. > > http://www.realsoftware.com/feedback/viewreport.php?reportid=jycozgss > http://www.realsoftware.com/feedback/viewreport.php?reportid=hzqyvxaw
I believe I've filed a similar one as well. The bug appears to be in the socket event handling code: It allows new incoming socket events to be processed immediately instead of putting them into a queue and handling them only if previous socket events have been handled. I wonder if Aaron, who would probably be responsible for this, even agrees that this is a bug? Thomas _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode: <http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/> Search the archives of this list here: <http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
