On 2/17/06, Joseph J. Strout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > At 12:45 PM +0100 2/17/06, Thomas Tempelmann wrote: > > > > http://www.realsoftware.com/feedback/viewreport.php?reportid=jycozgss > >> http://www.realsoftware.com/feedback/viewreport.php?reportid=hzqyvxaw > > > >I believe I've filed a similar one as well. > > > >The bug appears to be in the socket event handling code: It allows new > >incoming socket events to be processed immediately instead of putting > >them into a queue and handling them only if previous socket events > >have been handled. > > Only if the new event is Error. > > >I wonder if Aaron, who would probably be responsible for this, even > >agrees that this is a bug? > > If you're seeing it with anything but Error, it would be. With > Error, it is not.
I see overlapping DataAvailable events quite often. _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode: <http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/> Search the archives of this list here: <http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
