Well, I for one AM one of those actual companies who used RB to
create and distribute REAL software (no pun intended). Not some
small shareware app or some little tool. If this is what RB2006 is
supposed to be for, then RB should SAY that before they take your
money, then more money every 6 months just to GET to Universals,
which apparently isn't even close yet. How can they move forward
when ANY user who builds large apps have this nightmare? And they
know about it. And they have nothing to say. And just leaving it
like this...what a joke.
Mike
On Feb 19, 2006, at 11:08 AM, Bastian Bense wrote:
I hope REAL Software knows that there are actually companies living
from RB apps. There are not only hobbyists who create small tools or
shareware. In that prospect, RB 2006 is just perfect -- just keep the
application small and easy and you will be fine.
See this problem:
I have to provide Universal apps -> means I HAVE to move to RB 2006 ->
will result in a lot of work-overhead due to workarounds and lag
within the IDE -> costs money (developers want money, by the way) AND
costs even more money because we have to upgrade every workstation to
be able to actually launch RB.
Real? Please?
Basti
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>
Search the archives of this list here:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>
Search the archives of this list here:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
