If your project is 9MB or larger, and you're not having these
problems, PLEASE tell me how you did it...
On Feb 19, 2006, at 1:51 PM, Michael J. Hußmann wrote:
Stefan Pantke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Well, since RB started to write RB using RB, things started to
get bad.
This only goes to show you haven't been around that long. Judging from
the complaints voiced periodically, things started getting worse since
REALbasic 1.0 at least. I'm getting tired of these waves of "RB is
unusable" messages on the list; to me, it's just a waste of bandwidth,
making it harder to find the interesting bits within all the noise.
Maybe it is time to unsubscribe from the NUG.
Yes, RB 2006 has its share of bugs, but it's nothing I cannot live
with,
and I never considered going back to 5.5. I simply don't experience
the
problems some others do and I happen to like the new IDE, even when
there are still some cosmetic problems. Yes, I would love the
executables to be smaller, but it's not a big issue for me.
- Michael
Michael J. Hußmann
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW (personal): http://michael-hussmann.de
WWW (professional): http://digicam-experts.de
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>
Search the archives of this list here:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>
Search the archives of this list here:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
