Am 20.02.2006 um 16:59 schrieb Joseph J. Strout:
At 7:18 PM -0500 2/19/06, Chris Little wrote:
Maybe this is a reason that RS
has announced Cocoa support. Since they would be leveraging the
Cocoa
frameworks in the system software the total size of the built app
would be
smaller.
I'm not so sure about that. The existing code leverages the Carbon
frameworks, which requires a lot less code than accessing the Cocoa
ones. If anything, I'd expect the Cocoa runtime to be bigger. Its
main advantage is that it makes it easier in some ways to support
Intel Macs.
So what's the reason to replace Carbon by Cocoa?
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>
Search the archives of this list here:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
