That was why I talked about "Try to create a constructive list" of things that
goes wrong...
Also, this is why it is important that the RS Engineers stop using their special
REALbasic 5.9 version.
_OR_ if they do not saw what we complains about, they have to provide that tool
(REALbasic 5.9), so we will not see it too and we will be _current_ (on par with
RS Engineers)...
Emile
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Subject: Re: RB2006r1 VERY VERY Slow
From: Andrea Suraci <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2006 20:09:57 +0100
Michael Krugman wrote:
Andrea:
Isn't this amazing? This thread has grown a bunch since I started
it. I'm relieved to know it's not just me. I wonder where all the RB
guys are now. They're out here and I know they've received every post
to the thread. I didn't find very many complaints about RB2005 or
RB2006...that surprised me. I started the thread to find out if it
was just me, or if people just accepted this like it is, or if they've
moved on to XCode or something else...
Yes, this thread is a good thing, but, based on the past experiences
with threads like this, I do not think we will have any tangible results
anytime soon. There were some complaints about compile speed in the past
year, and the best I could see from the RS guys was "We do not see what
you see" (which would explain a lot of things).
> "We do not see what you see"
Wear your glasses ?
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>
Search the archives of this list here:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
